App dev can be outsource, but it really doesn’t matter who run the hard coded instance. It could by. Sh.itjust.works. it would be an issue if the app took off and the instance wasn’t ready for the influx.

Maybe it picks an instance at random to distribute the load.

My original idea in my head was that the app developer would run the instance that was hard coded

Lemmy is more stable than what that graph makes it out. I’m not sure how easy it is to track fediverse since instances can pop up at any moment then grow or even the domain can change for an instance

I do have the idea of making an app it makes an account for one instance and uses that “log in with Google/apple id”. Then people can learn later that you you can join other instances or log in via web browser.

The server can be simple lemmy or mastodon server and the app can just be variant of Voyager or mastodon app. Someone need to get rid of copyright material then hard code an instance.

I would do it myself but I can’t get an AI to code apps

The other option is to have an app that browser based

Oh no Sam Seder is hawt 😨

I don’t see how fediverse is responsible for solving echo chambers. I would say it’s on the individual to explore new ideas and to challenge everything.

Like an instance can just be 4chan offshoot that isn’t federated and complete echo chamber and hypothetically be the biggest instance. I would want any government telling them to federate, I wouldn’t want them to be forced to to federate, I’m perfectly fine with them having their party and inviting whoever they want, I can go somewhere else.

Plus fediverse is about giving control of social media to individuals

Circle jerks are only bad if they’re right Wing. Leftist circle jerks are fine

Yeah messed me up that queue, que, and cue sound the same in English. Que was close enough to cue anyway

Lol what are word what does “caller” mean

Can’t find any new stories there is one 11 months ago that an ice vehicles was on fire but no one claiming it was arson

I don’t have the mindset that people disagree with socialism but I see socialism as copying what the rich do “seizing the means of production”

Reminds me of when I talked to the right wing German guy about their post. Like I thought they were gonna be more articulate about their position

I remember encountered an IDF soldier online and attacked both him and his message, openly said he wasn’t convincing, I believe whistleblowers over him, and that I actually hated him.

kind of weird that they call a 12 year old a seducer.

Reminds me of how a great Dane would bark at me for punching a punching bag. Bruh it’s not alive , I’m not hurting it.

Damn that’s one scary toad-rrorist

Violence seems to get the working class a lot of advantages

That’s cool, but you’re still commanded to hate in the biblical sense by jesus what you changes but you still have to do it.

You can look at Jesus telling you to both sell and/or give up everything as a test, but you still gotta do it. Like you can say a litteral test to get a certificate is there to test your aptitude but you still gotta pass the test.

I also had a revelation that ownership is a time/culture dependant and God’s deciding after people been owning things for thousands of years at that point to say “give up everything”

Did anyone think this wasn’t a distraction from the Epstien files

I figured someone would. I was thinking of using a stone to break a nut or stand up a pot. If you leave the stone were you found it, it’s not like you own the stone.

But then we’re does it go from using something to owning something. Seems ownership would be more of a legal distinction or ownership is emotional attachment

Ikr. Like offer the other cheek wasn’t meant to show you passivism but like this way to get people you don’t like to use a other hand in a taboo way. I guess I have to assume it’s more correct interpretation since it’s relevant for that culture.

At this point Jesus can “you have to do X” and it get interpreted as a point for how you should live and think.