

No duh, you seem to think that you speak some truth to power when you’re not.
No duh, you seem to think that you speak some truth to power when you’re not.
Speak for yourself.
Capitalism doesn’t hold a candle to other institutions when it comes to ruining a nation.
Importing mistrust of institutions from other countries is doing that work.
Woah woah there Mr Radical. None can withstand such bold flavors combined. Vanilla AND chocolate?
Preposterous
Just about all spirits that are aged in a wooden barrel gets a hint of vanilla flavor, hence i consider it a wood flavor.
Haha. I don’t think anyone on Lemmy should be so quick to call others out for self hate. The amount of “oh look at me, i’m broken” posts on lemmy per minute, even exceeds the amount of their genders.
No, of course not the MAC. Just as an example nmap can guess the OS based on fingerprinted behaviours. There are pentesttools that can guess the OS.
Like i said. Old days. You could get access to a distribution switch where the physical security was all that mattered. The town where i grew up had some early variation of cg-nat that meant all devices where in a way on the same network. It created plenty of issues when trying to play online with friends during Quake/WC3 etc.
I mean, i get the sentiment, but wouldn’t the equivalent situation for cars be when they also leave the car? Like when dumbfuck in pickup parks in 3 lanes or similar?
Your ip is the identity of your router.
By using simple tools you can find the manufacturer of your router and potentially use a known security to gain access to your network.
You expose yourself to being targeted by focused network attacks, since they know the address belongs to you.
In ye olden days, it would have been possible to track your ip and what it was accessing online. Its harder to do today due to cryptography and vpn’s, but still a risk.
TIL. But it’s hardly necesessary to have a PHD in psychiatry to understand the funny part in this.
Uhm… Sure. Lets just gloss over the 400 types of personality disorder i guess. But the headline specifically states “one day without eating”
The cooking part is just the funny bit
Honestly. Many things were so much better before.
If you didn’t like it on the internet, you could just not use it. Nowadays everyone with a pulse is forced to be on the internet, even if they shouldn’t.
People used to understand that things existing digitally, meant that they would spread on the internet. Including and especially incriminating stuff. Trolling people who where clueless used to be fun too. The iOS7 update campaign where people were stupid enough to microwave their phones to charge them was incredibly funny.
There wasn’t karmaremoved or attention seeking, in fact you would be chastised for acting like you wanted attention.
Does it help your mental health to spam posts on various instances and communities every day? I was scrolling “all” and it appears that you spend a lot of time here.
Are you ok? There might be more productive outlets.
Sometimes i really wish i had the time to get into a fenderbender, just so that the asshole behind gets their comeuppance.
Not an actual encouragement for break checking idiots, please be safe.
Read a bit of the Kemp wiki and found this unrelated gem:
“Georgia was one of 14 states that used electronic voting machines that produced no paper record, which election integrity experts say left elections vulnerable to tampering and technical problems”
Well. I see no problems that could arise from that 😑
I mean, technically still not any gerrymandering in the presidential elections. Just making sure we understand what the word means. Otherwise we can extend the meaning to say something like: poverty leads to zoning of the empoverished which leads to gerrymandering. That doesn’t mean that poverty = gerrymandering
Do explain how gerrymandering affects the presidential election. All votes are counted for the entire state.
I get that it affects local elections. That is obvious.
Could say the same about you. Stop wasting time for other people. Have some decency.
Think i’d rather read anything interesting from a political adversary than say, Chomsky.