These are the four stages of Rand al’Thor

It’s Canonical’s (the company that created/updates/supports Ubuntu) package format. There are a few problems.

They can only be hosted on proprietary Canonical servers. That sort of flies in the face of one of the “free” aspects of Linux. Canonical is also sort of fostering a reputation of abandoning/massively changing something core in Ubuntu every couple major releases, which has made some wary of depending on snaps, since if Canonical decides to stop hosting them, anyone dependent on them is kinda screwed. Snaps can also chew up disk space if you’re not careful. I don’t think that’s necessarily unique to snaps, but in my experience that issue has been worse with snaps than with comparable alternatives like flatpaks.

They don’t add milk or milk substitute to blizzards. Blizzards are not shakes.

No might about it, in the US, definitionally, a milkshake is ice cream blended with milk at minimum. It can optionally have mixins or syrups blended in as well, but if there’s no milk (or milk alternative)*, it ain’t a milkshake

No that’s yo mama

For example, water usage of $10K per month would prompt the landlord to get those meters added.

Our more likely, raise everyone’s rent to cover the excessive water use.

So did you just skip the 95% of that comment that was specifically about handguns?

I don’t think the claim is that Trump/Epstein did the murder themselves, but that the murder was done by someone to cover up their rape.

Grandfather is ABC, dad is python2

Why would I move your discussion

All the more reason to have your discussion somewhere else, in a place that isn’t dedicated to shitposts.

All of these answers are either nonsensical or based purely on non-standard personal experience.

Yeah I read what you wrote. I responded to it. I’ll put it here again just in case you missed it.

If you don’t want to talk about specifics, what are you even here for?

I’m genuinely not irritated, just incredibly confused. Why haven’t you listened to or left any voicemails in the years? Why do you think voicemails are unreasonable? Why don’t you see that they’re a perfectly reasonable way to communicate important things when someone doesn’t answer their phone? What rock are you living under to where you disagree that spam/scam calls are more prevalent than ever? What makes you think that if you think spam/scam calls are more prevalent, that you shouldn’t give your number to potential employers? Like how are those things related at all?

I just have more questions with every comment man. Confusion, genuine, heartfelt confusion. Not irritation.

We’re talking about actions we can take against our political leaders/political system, are we not? Is that somehow not political?

IDK man, I’m just trying to steer you in a productive direction, because asking a bunch of leading questions in the comment section ain’t it. If you don’t want to talk about specifics, what are you even here for?

Sounds like a great opportunity to make a post in one of the many political communities on Lemmy then, to create some real discussion. Rather than stringing us along in the comment section here.

The moon, due to it’s unusual size and proximity for a moon, has a much greater effect on the tides than the sun. That’s why the tides are more closely linked to the moon’s orbit around the earth, not the Earth’s around the sun.

Earth’s orbital distance has pretty much always been “perfect” though. It hasn’t really changed much since it’s formation 4-5 billion years ago.

Unless you mistyped and you’re talking about the moon’s orbital distance? In which case, it’s actually kind of the opposite of what you’re claiming. It’s estimated that life first popped up pretty close to when the planet and moon finished forming, at which point the moon’s orbital distance would have made it appear larger than the sun and probably fully obscure the sun + it’s corona during an eclipse.

Eh, Jim Beam is generally considered cheaper, kinda bottom-shelf stuff these days. Fine for a bourbon and coke, but not really intended to be sipped neat. I wouldn’t really be surprised by a bourbon-lover turning their nose up at it, regardless of who owns the brand.

What do you think I think you’re arguing? I’ve read your responses in our thread. It seems like your position is that one must always answer their phone, regardless of whether they recognize the number or not, if they have provided their number to a potential employer. To me that seems like a totally unreasonable position, because

1. There are several very valid reasons for not answering your phone outside of not recognizing the number

2. Not answering your phone for unrecognized numbers is best practice nowadays, since the amount of spam/scam calls people receive has never been higher

3. If a caller wants a response but can’t reach a person with their initial call, leaving a message is the widely accepted next best course of action, as it clarifies to the recipient that even though the call came from an unrecognized number, it’s a legitimate call and a response is expected

Again, I’m just baffled that you’re arguing against any of this.