• WanderingThoughts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That too is the classical hype cycle. After the trough of disillusionment, and that’s going to be a deep one from the look of things, people figure out where it can be used in a profitable way in its own niches.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      … Unless its mass proliferation of shitty broken code and mis/disinformation and hyperparasocial relationships and waste of energy and water are actually such a net negative that it fundamentally undermines infrastructure and society, thus raising the necessary profit margin too high for such legit use cases to be workable in a now broken economic system.

    • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Time will tell how much was just hype, and how much actually had merit. I think it will go the way of the .com bubble.

      LOTS of uses for the internet of things, but it’s still overhyped

        • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Fair enough.

          The dot-com bubble (late 1990s–2000) was when investors massively overvalued internet-related companies just because they had “.com” in their name, even if they had no profits or solid business plans. It burst in 2000, wiping out trillions in value.

          The “Internet hype” bubble popped. But the Internet still has many valid uses.