• Bademantel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s incorrect. Nuclear power is one of the more expensive options when you factor in the costs after operation ends, which you should obviously do.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Remove coal subsidies and factor in newer reactor technology before you calculate nuclear cost.

        • Bademantel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          That’s kind of funny. Nuclear energy is actually getting more expensive:

          Source

          A few reasons come to mind:

          • The newer the technology, the higher the cost.
          • Each reactor and its power plant is a huge project. This makes scaling up production difficult. And please don’t start with tiny reactors. We’re not in Fallout.
          • Safety standards have risen.

          There are probably more reasons. I would of course not compare it to coal but to renewables. They’re the future. Storage will be needed but those options are also getting cheaper by the day.