• GardenGeek
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Either way, the actual goal of censoring news from the White House is achieved… and in the case of this solidarity, the effect is even greater. Or am I misunderstanding something here?

    /edit: Okay I actually misunderstood something: Its not about media coverage in total but about giving Trump a platform. This makes much more sense.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Does it change anything? They will still get the video feed and can react to it. It’s just their reporters not being there at the moment to ask questions. Trump will still spout nonsense continuously.

          • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            The networks also provide the audio tech:

            Trump’s first live event on Monday with no TV press pool — a ribbon-cutting ceremony for his new helipad — was livestreamed to the White House website. However, Trump’s remarks were indiscernible throughout the video; the helicopter’s loud noise completely drowned out his voice.