• 7 Posts
  • 320 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 10th, 2026

help-circle

  • GardenGeektome_irl@lemmy.worldMe_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Air has a higher concentration of oxygen than water, hence it’s physiologically easier (and more reliabel looking at the correlation of water temp and oxygen saturation) to meet ones oxygen needs by breathing air and wales had no disadvantage opting for lungs instead of gills.



  • GardenGeektoComic Strips@lemmy.worldA racial slur
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don’t think so.

    In my opinion, egoists represent a clear minority and would not be able to suppress everyone else by force. The series of revolutions and democratizations that have occurred throughout history is, in my view, proof of this.

    The majority holds the power, and the rule of egoists is only possible as long as the vast majority accepts it (because the disadvantages of being ruled by egoists are offset by sufficiently large benefits of cooperation).

    To some extent, therefore, we must also take a good look at ourselves for accepting the status quo as it is and not wanting to change it because it would be too inconvenient.


  • GardenGeektoComic Strips@lemmy.worldA racial slur
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yet we chose candidates… even though the pre-selection is biased towards egoists.

    Looking at the current rise of populism ''we" actually seem to deliberately chose the most egoistic ones available.

    But nonetheless: Imho representation automatically leads to corruption by egoists so we should get rid of representatives all together (or at least try to rein them in by making it possible to remove them from office at any time )


  • Two things that come to my mind:

    1. In our current society money equals power over others. If you’re not the richest your not the most powerful and if you are you need to fight to proetct your power from other who are getting richer. It’s not about money but about determining the fate of others and rulership over society.
    2. You don’t become obsecely rich by being a good person. Once you reach a billion dollars you most paobably already aquired a mindeset that leaves you no other choice than to look for another billion. Much like a hamster in a wheel which spins to fast to let it go off.

    In the eyes of average humans (which I believe to be decent people, at least 80 % of the total population) this is insane… however the 10 - 20 % egoists are the ones we chose as our rulers.












  • GardenGeektoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldScience
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    There is a difference between “having enough money prevents people from turning to crime to survive and meet their basic needs” and “having more money allows you to buy more happiness, even if your basic needs have long since been met.”