• peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I’m not sure that this was a mistake that had been made before. I’m not sure it was a mistake myself. Unknown individuals compromised the security of the embassy. While they were protestors, not authorities, the embassy had little information.

      However it seems odd to me that the embassy was guarded by Marines, not National guard.

      Edit; ok I didn’t know that the Nat guard is deployed for combat, not base security.

      • BigFig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 days ago

        odd to me that the embassy was guarded by Marines, not National guard.

        What? That’s the job of the marines. All major US embassies are guarded by Marines across the world.

          • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 days ago

            Where are you getting your info on how overseas bases run?! MPs deal with the general day to day security of bases with a station of marines (no smaller than a squad.) on hand for serious issues. National Guard, usually only call themselves National Guard when guarding the 50 states.

            • NoTagBacks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              Well, the detachments of Marines are at the Embassies, usually each branch handles their own security at their own bases. They can and do call up their local MSG det from time to time, but their[MSG] responsibility is the Embassy, the classified info held at those Embassies, and their personnel. National Guard outside the US is usually a supplement to whatever federal branch is running things wherever they get deployed.

            • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              Ok, so, no, Nat gaurd deploys all the time overseas under Federal Title 10 missions.

              I incorrectly assumed they would be stationed on bases as base security.

          • NoTagBacks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            Okay, to be clear, ALL US Embassies are guarded by Marines. It’s a 3 year B-billet some Marines serve across the world for a year at each duty station. There’s a school for MSG at Quantico. As for why, for one, Marines have great PR as the toughest the US military has to offer (which has a bit of truth to it, but is greatly exaggerated). Marines are also generally used as shock troops and escorts, naturally leading to a general infrastructure of an [perceived] elite guard pipeline. Also, those blues uniforms look damn good, which is also why it’s generally Marines that are the guards front and center around the white house.

            In terms of who generally staffs US military bases, it depends on which branch is stationed there. All branches have their own MPs as an MOS or job. Marines are pretty much just on the US coasts and Japan. The Other branches are pretty much all over, though. Lots of them are mixed, too. But usually the staff is gonna be Army, Navy, or [ch]Air Force, depending on the purpose of the base. National Guard is really only gonna be staffing their own bases in their state, or filling in somewhere under one of the Federal branches as a “deployment”.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        National Guard wouldn’t be outside the US. The embassy is outside the US. Marines or Army are who we use for guarding our stuff outside the US.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    12 days ago

    U.S. Marines opened fire on demonstrators during the storming of the Karachi consulate over the weekend, two U.S. officials said on Monday—a rare use ​of force at a diplomatic post that could sharply escalate tensions in the country ‌amid widespread protests over the killing of Iran’s leader.

    Ten people were killed on Sunday when protesters breached the compound’s outer wall after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in strikes on Iran