TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agodesign ruleimagemessage-square57linkfedilinkarrow-up1239arrow-down110
arrow-up1229arrow-down1imagedesign ruleTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square57linkfedilink
minus-squarePatrikvo@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoWhat’s worse is the implication that Jar-jar was good character design.
minus-squaresem@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoI think he was but I was the target audience
minus-squareQueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoHe was, just not for the movie he was in. I mean Minions can be funny, but you’d never put one in Lord of the Rings.
minus-squareTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoLord Jar-Jar is iconic!
What’s worse is the implication that Jar-jar was good character design.
I think he was but I was the target audience
He was, just not for the movie he was in.
I mean Minions can be funny, but you’d never put one in Lord of the Rings.
Lord Jar-Jar is iconic!