A Democratic National Committee member is proposing a symbolic resolution for consideration at a DNC meeting next month to reject the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s massive spending on Congressional races.
The measure, sponsored by a young DNC member from Florida, could put party leaders on the spot about the pro-Israel lobbying group’s outsized role in Democratic primaries.
A lobbying behemoth that for decades courted lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, AIPAC has become an increasingly toxic brand in the Democratic Party.
In recent years, Israeli leaders and their backers in Washington have become more closely aligned with Republican politicians. At the same time, however, AIPAC’s super PAC has focused tens of millions in spending on Democratic primary races.
DNC “You could say AIPAC’s arguments moved me to a BIGGER HOUSE……. I said the quiet part loud and the loud part quiet. Oh, dear.”
Yep, cut them all off. Any relationship with the Genocidal Israeli Government is a drag on votes, and Dems cant afford to squander a single vote by defending Genocide.
Right now, MAGA has the biggest Israel problem, by far. It’s a good opportunity to widen that important gap between the parties, not close it.
They won’t lose any votes. Many American Jews do not support Israel’s genocidal behavior, and those that do were going to vote MAGA anyway.
Dnc will move from aipac to j streets
As they should. AIPAC funding is going to be the most toxic thing to any Democratic Party candidate’s campaign this election cycle…
Let’s strip away all the context here. No Israel. No U.S. no Democrats/Republicans.
Imagine I told you a fictional country, the United Grapes of Dumberica was formed.
Now imagine I told you that the government of this country had people from foreign governments both friendly and hostile giving them money.
In what logical universe would would that be legal?
Well i just create a law that says it’s legal, and use the wages you earned as a productive member of society to fund the force of oppression against you. And if you dare say anything, I’ll label you as a terrorist.
Pretty simple really.
Then I’ll burst into any room and exclaim we are the greatest grapers in the entire world
You sound like a big grapist.
I just explained how the US government operates lol
Ok. I wasn’t criticizing.
My bad. Apologies.
I forgot i set the joke up, and failed to capitalize on your continuation. I’m an idiot.
There’s next time no worries.
Politics is hard.
If a pedophile can do it, how hard can it be?
Not that kind.
NOT allowing Israel to Control your Countries finances? That’s ANTI SEMETIC!
It’s actually anti-semitic for Israel to meddle in other nation’s politics because ironically enough it affirms nazi propaganda about the world being run by a secret jewish cabal… add in the Epstein honeypot and one might be tempted to say it was true all along…
It’s a fucking torment nexus.
Hope the AIPAC funding stops. Will it ? Who knows.
As long as money has sway, someone will take their money.
If the Illinois race with Kat Abughazaleh is any indication AIPAC with use shell organizations to hide the source of the money.
They’re already contributing through pacs that hide contributions
Not if cuck Schumer had a say
If you’re in his vicinity, you can hear the sound of moaning, licking and gobbling - as he worked his way through Netenyahu’s boots and have started working his toes.
Removed by mod
Timing this a week AFTER Palestinian-American progressive badass Kat Abughazaleh lost her primary by just four thousand votes.
A primary where both the eventual winner and the third placed establishment favorite were supported by millions of dollars worth of AIPAC ad campaigns.
This is a giant waste of time.
A) Restricting AIPAC just means capital and influence will flow from other, more obscure sources. It’s squeezing a closed tube of toothpaste.
B) PACs should be illegal, full stop. So long as PACs exist, capital will continue to flow into our politics. And as the cost burden of jumping through regulatory hoops and sidestepping ridiculous half-measures like this one is trivial for large donors, PACs disproportionally benefit highly-funded causes as opposed to those powered by small donations.
No half measures. Make PACs illegal.
Yep. If we can’t wave a magic wand and fully solve all problems instantly we should just do nothing.
Fuck Lemmy.
Ah, but this might be a step in that direction.
After all, what politician receiving AIPAC funding is going to vote to make PACs illegal?
Take that nectar away, and what’s stopping them?
Campaign Finance Reform is the issue from which ALL other issues flow. We need to take all money out of politics, make all political contributions illegal. Campaigns should receive basic Federal funding, with strict regulations on campaign speech. Those who violate those regulations will find themselves ejected from the race, and prohibited from running in the future.
This style of campaign will filter for those who are most qualified, instead of filtering OUT the best, in favor of clowns. Candidates like Trump wouldn’t stand a chance.
But the gEnOsiiiiiiiDE!!1! /s
Just saying, screaming lefties won’t scream if it doesn’t say Zionism on the tin. So - sure, use the undemocratic tools provided by the fascist courts. Dog forbid anyone dig further than one layer into an issue.
