Opening major new fields in the North Sea would make almost no difference to the UK’s reliance on gas imports, research has shown.

The Jackdaw field, one of the largest unexploited gasfields in the North Sea, would displace only 2% of the UK’s current imports of gas, which would leave the UK still almost entirely dependent on supplies from Norway and a few other sources.

The Rosebank field, also in Scottish waters but mainly containing oil, would displace only about 1% of the UK’s gas imports.

Tessa Khan, executive director of Uplift, the campaign group, which compiled the data from public sources, said: “New fields like Jackdaw and Rosebank would do vanishingly little to boost UK gas production. Even in the most optimistic scenario, and assuming none of its gas is exported, Jackdaw would provide just 2% of UK demand over its nine- to 12-year lifetime.”

It has already been shown, by authorities including the UK Energy Research Centre, that new drilling would not reduce oil and gas prices, or improve the UK’s energy security. It is also unlikely to produce durable jobs or major new tax revenues, as 90% of the UK’s North Sea oil and gas has already been burned, putting the industry in steep and irrecoverable decline. Companies are also demanding tax breaks to tap the new fields, which are harder to access than existing supplies.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anybody who’s suggesting this either doesn’t know any better (public being misled) or they are trying to war profiteer (politicians / industry lobbyists).

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Upgrade the grid. Subsidise mass insulation programmes across the country. Build more renewable and nuclear power sources. Get fucked old school oil and gas.

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re right and the government agrees with you! They’re doing all that but there are real limits to how quickly it can be done.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t understand the delay on adding more capacity between sections of the grid. This is the smallest part of the infrastructure development, would have a significant impact on how much gas we burnt, and would save billions of pounds in curtailment/turn up costs, but seems to be taking forever.

        • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t know the details, but I do remember people before the election saying that was likely to be a big stumbling block. Seems they were right, unfortunately!

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    So? I don’t understand the argument?

    We currently need oil and gas, and will for the foreseeable future, we may as well get it ourselves instead of paying foreign despots for it.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      We, the UK, wouldn’t own it. The oil and gas companies would, and they would sell on the open market to get the best price they could. So even if the government gave the license, the British people would only benefit through a small amount of tax collected.

    • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.ukOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s not enough gas to meet our demands and what gas is left is more expensive to extract. The money would be better spent on transitioning away from fossil fuels faster.

    • WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Drilling in the North Sea is the equivalent of trying to pay off your mortgage by digging through the couch cushions. All the oil and gas out there is essentially gone and what little you can extract will be incredibly expensive and environmentally damaging.

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        what little you can extract will be incredibly expensive

        Why do companies want to fund it’s extraction then?

        • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’ve hit the nail on the head, there. The gas companies are betting that demand for gas won’t go away any time soon. If they’re right and they have the licences to extract it, they’ll still profit, even if the profits are smaller.

        • scratchee@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          They want the government to lower its taxes/fees on extraction so that more becomes just barely profitable.

          Without that change, there’s only a few small places they’d be willing to drill. But if the government waives its cut suddenly they can drill somewhat more, still nothing particularly impressive though.

          Of course, that means the uk gets basically no benefit, and if it’s only profitable with government generosity then it’s sure as hell not going to be profitable with a limited market (ie if we forced them to sell to the uk and actually help with the uk problems)

          Tldr: they are hoping the uk are rubes they can scam.

        • spagbolioli@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          it’s more of a political thing

          reform need to be questioned on how much of these oil and gas profits are going to be handed back to the british people will it be a norway model (national fund saving for the future) or a thatcher model (resources simply handed to a private company to profit from and sold back to the british people at global rates)