• GMac@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    What is being pushed for implementation is better described as identity verification, not age verification.

    I would have little issue with a solution that purely gated services on age in a secure and privacy respecting manner. This OS level garbage is not that, its creating an oligarchy run identity gate to control access to personal computing.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Thank you. Now I just wish somebody at the government level would understand this and the implications of what this entails. Like maybe mention that all their weird online fetishes could be tracked back to them. It’s like this one company doing the “verification “ would be rolling in kompromat.

      • queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 hours ago

        it’s all by design. they don’t want the general public to put it together that these are identify tracking surveillance system, just a carefree age verification to keep kids away from the baddies 🙄

      • GMac@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Agreed. The model is a good start, the security of it’s implementation woefully inadequate… And I agree this MUST use post quantum cryptography.

        Dox-gating (yes I just made that up lol) operating systems will result in people not updating security patches.