• Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nuclear waste is solvable, just not with existing market mechanisms. There were plans to reprocess nuclear waste before tge fall of the USSR lowered the price of Uranium ore.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not a great comparison given that climate change does continuous, irreparable damage, whereas nuclear waste from power plants just sits there. Nuclear waste from nuclear weapon production is its own issue tho.

        • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If it doesn’t do anything and ‘just sits there’ why do we have to be so careful where we put it? I don’t normally bury all my harmless materials at the bottom of a mine

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            So that it does continue to just sit there. If you dissolve it in ground water or concentrate so much of it it vaporizes or break it up and disperse it, it is no longer just sitting there.

            Also lots of materials are harmless when treated correctly, and dangerous if dispersed.