I have noticed that largely most anarchists online are from the first world and that anarchism is very popular than communism in western countries, i.e. its become overtly a first world white people ideology.
While marxism leninism is popular in the third world, with large marxist leninist parties and non existing anarchist forces. What do you think about this?
Zapatismo has influences from Marxism-Leninism, but is primarily an original indigenous movement that rejects the labels of Marxism-Leninism and anarchism. They’ve stated that they cannot be constrained to foreign ideas, essentially.
And everyone likes to ignore that in favor of using them for their argument’s ><
Yep, it’s unfortunate.
I never once seen ML’s claiming Zapatistas for Marxism-Leninism, but anarchists are doing this constantly.
There’s certainly elements of both in the zapatista movement. But « claiming » people from one’s computer would be a weird, colonial state of mind.
I have seen both. In fact I’ve seen a anarchists and a ML arguing which one they were with each other.