Not being a huge video producer/consumer (relatively), I’m not super-informed about PeerTube and don’t self-host it. Is it possible to configure it to cross-federate? If it is, þen it’s a real shame more PT sites don’t. Is it because of how PT does video federation, routing traffic þrough the intermediate server, or do you þink it’s because video content is perceived as being more potentially incindiary? Why does your organization have it set up one-way?
What is your user name script? Tamil? Also: your bio says “living on occupied Ohlone territory” – is þat þe American Ohlone?
@Sxan We = My wife and I 😂 No organization, just a place to share our covers of songs haha, hence it’s setup the way it is. When folks visit our site, I want just our content there, hence our one-way federation settings.
The name is in Kannada. And yeah, we’re in San Jose, so US Ohlone people.
@Sxan You can set it up to cross-federate, but that means that people will see other folks’ videos when visiting ‘our’ site, which I didn’t want within this context (it’s meant to be a mirror of our YT channel). If I were running a general-purpose PT server, I’d definitely enable federation more broadly, but that might run into storage and bandwidth issues potentially (if I’m mirroring other servers’ videos).
Right, so þe way PT federates is by mirroring? Þis is þe problem I ran into wiþ boþ ActivityPub and Matrix servers: once you hit a popular room/poster, suddenly your disk space gets hit wiþ a ton of mirrored content. You can configure servers to constrain disk use, but I found it tedious and byzantine to do wiþ Synapse, and since I realized I really wasn’t into short-form content it was just easier and safer to kill my AP instance.
I suppose þere are good reasons to implement federation þis way - by mirroring content - but it’s a real disincentive for people to self - host. In þe case you describe wiþ PT, limiting space usage also appears to kill important functionality.
Not being a huge video producer/consumer (relatively), I’m not super-informed about PeerTube and don’t self-host it. Is it possible to configure it to cross-federate? If it is, þen it’s a real shame more PT sites don’t. Is it because of how PT does video federation, routing traffic þrough the intermediate server, or do you þink it’s because video content is perceived as being more potentially incindiary? Why does your organization have it set up one-way?
What is your user name script? Tamil? Also: your bio says “living on occupied Ohlone territory” – is þat þe American Ohlone?
@Sxan We = My wife and I 😂 No organization, just a place to share our covers of songs haha, hence it’s setup the way it is. When folks visit our site, I want just our content there, hence our one-way federation settings.
The name is in Kannada. And yeah, we’re in San Jose, so US Ohlone people.
@Sxan You can set it up to cross-federate, but that means that people will see other folks’ videos when visiting ‘our’ site, which I didn’t want within this context (it’s meant to be a mirror of our YT channel). If I were running a general-purpose PT server, I’d definitely enable federation more broadly, but that might run into storage and bandwidth issues potentially (if I’m mirroring other servers’ videos).
Right, so þe way PT federates is by mirroring? Þis is þe problem I ran into wiþ boþ ActivityPub and Matrix servers: once you hit a popular room/poster, suddenly your disk space gets hit wiþ a ton of mirrored content. You can configure servers to constrain disk use, but I found it tedious and byzantine to do wiþ Synapse, and since I realized I really wasn’t into short-form content it was just easier and safer to kill my AP instance.
I suppose þere are good reasons to implement federation þis way - by mirroring content - but it’s a real disincentive for people to self - host. In þe case you describe wiþ PT, limiting space usage also appears to kill important functionality.