I am considering to get my first FF camera and has been difficult to decide which one to get. I am looking for a system that is lightweight (as long as possible), looks vintage, can be used with vintage lenses.

What would you suggest?

  • snrkl@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Before you buy it, I always suggest you rent or borrow one and make sure it works for you.

    I was going to choose a Canon based on specs and reviews. I rented one and hated it. All the functions were on the back and I found it quite hard to get in the flow, spending all my time “chimping” the menus.

    I borrowed a friends Nikon, and found all the buttons I wanted were where my fingers were, and I just naturally found it gelled. I found I spent more time taking the pictures I wanted, and less time messing around.

    My partner on the other hand hates my Nikon, and has a Canon that she loves…

  • berty@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    FF and vintage looking I only know of Nikon Z. If you can afford maybe Leica M-Series. Fuji has vintage looking cameras too but their lineup is APS-C.

    If your looking for a lightweight system I wouldn’t go FF. The bodies aren’t too heavy but the lenses are a lot heavier.

  • Etnaphele@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Apart from Leica M, I’d say Nikon Zf if it has to be FF and vintage + don’t fancy paying huge sums for your first FF camera.

    Sony a7C series are rangefinder style but are not vintage by any means.

    Alternatively, Canon R8/R6: in my eyes they could be seen as vintage, because Canon body design is unchanged since decades :D

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Only you can answer this. Here’s how:

    Create a spreadsheet with a row for each parameter for comparison, size, weight, price, warranty, resolution, lens fitting, etc.

    For each camera you’re considering, add a column to your spreadsheet with the answers to your parameters. Add parameters as required.

    To find the best camera for you, compare the first two columns and only the first two. Compare parameters and pick the best option between those two cameras. Hide the column of the least desirable camera.

    Then compare the winner against the next column.

    Rinse and repeat until there’s one left.

    That’s the camera for you.

  • racoon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Leica meets all your criteria. You can attach a Noctilux 50/1,2 lens. Maybe one of the best lenses ever created in the history of the universe

      • Etnaphele@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Those aren’t vintage looking and are essentially rebadged Panasonic cameras. I think they’re referring to Leica M.

        Any vintage lens can be adapted to any mirrorless system though

        • racoon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes. OP would spare no expenses as s/he didn’t mention a budget. Nevertheless, for the price of a Leica I would buy a Hasselblad, but they are significantly heavier and not vintage looking. Besides, the Leica has optical wayfinder whereas the HB now have continuous autofocus with Lidar. They seem to be similarly priced, around $10,000 without a lens.

          The Noctilux seems to be selling for around $8,500. That would mean $3,000 more expensive than when I first looked it up around 10 years ago

          edit: at 7,500 euros, the Hasselblad seems like a bargain compared to the Leica