• ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yup. The tv landscape has changed in ways that no one can really understand.

    I say it a lot, but from my perspective, RTD came back and made pretty much the same show he did the first time around, and got a vastly different outcome.

    It’s more worrying that the BBC still, 20+ years into the streaming era, don’t seem to have understood that “linear TV”, as well as the ritual of communal watching, are pretty much in the past.

    I wonder how much of that is wishful thinking on their part, and how much of it is structural, leaving them no choice. Any time I see a story about the state of the Beeb, it sounds pretty dire.

    • SiliconAvatar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      And even more, the TV landscape is still changing. Streaming is not a Klondike for companies or viewers anymore. I have no idea what’s going to materialise further down the road, but the stage is definitely being set for a change. That’s why it’s so bad for BBC shows like Who that the broadcaster is stuck in a '90s understanding of viewerships.

      As for RTD… I’m sure he was hired to work the same magic as he did in 2005, and I think he tried. But he’s twenty years older now, and at a completely different place in his life and career. It was almost inevitable that this return would have a “How are you doing, fellow kids” feeling both on screen and in his press/social updates. And AFAICT his understanding of modern viewing habits is as poor as the BBC leadership’s.

      I would have much preferred if he’d stuck to the 60th anniversary specials and then taken a step back to coach his replacement from an executive or advisory position. But that’s just wistful thinking, and rear view mirror rationalisation.

      • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        And AFAICT his understanding of modern viewing habits is as poor as the BBC leadership’s.

        Honestly, I don’t think he cares much. And to the extent that he does care, I think it’s pretty solidly on the side of “Doctor Who is for kids,” and so he’s unafraid to get very silly with it.

        I would have much preferred if he’d stuck to the 60th anniversary specials and then taken a step back to coach his replacement from an executive or advisory position.

        Yeah…I had extremely mixed feelings about him coming back, and the outcome was really worse than I imagined. But he still managed to produce a few top-tier episodes in all that mess.

        Onward and upward. I hope.

        • SiliconAvatar@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Onward and upward. I hope.

          Yep. The show is a bloody mess right now, but my hope is somebody will turn out a fresh take within the next couple of years. There has to be somebody who can build from here and focus on making fun/scary/weird time travel stories without being bogged down by the history of it all.