So they’re veterans, they served their country, but they just happen to be non-cis. Coverage denied.
Next are they going to deny coverage for people that don’t like UFC? For anyone who voted Democrat? Make it make sense.
Make it make sense.
It’s about hurting the people they are supposed to be hurting.
Exactly. The cruelty is the point.
ELIMINATING Healthcare for Veterans is how we SUPPORT the Veterans!
-Republicans LITERALLY!
If we’re so tight on funds, maybe we shouldn’t be hiring so many new Congress people?
tight on funds
Things are better in other countries, but this particular lie is almost universal, as are the “solutions”: bashing minorities & slashing funding for social services to keep the gen pop entertained, while the money flows to projects rich people benefit from.
The article’s topic is more ideological though; the Trump admin’s continued efforts to eliminate anything LGBTQ+.
New senators and representatives are slightly cheaper than the existing ones, although with a fixed size of 100 and 435 it’s not highly variable.
And fixing the house at the size it was a century ago when the country was a third its current population contributed to the house.not being responsive.
I wonder when the day will come that a judge sees shit like this and decides anything saying woman or man should be included, just to legally fuck with the Administration. Imagine someone trying to deny healthcare or something else for trans individuals and they learn they wrote something that is legally interpreted as including CIS women and men. I’d like to see the moment that backfire occurs.
Good luck in the midterms
