Why rural healthcare fund’s $50B focus on tech upgrades may not help vulnerable hospitals and providers

theconversation.com

cross-posted to:
enshitification@slrpnk.net

Why rural healthcare fund’s $50B focus on tech upgrades may not help vulnerable hospitals and providers

theconversation.com

Midnight@slrpnk.net to

Public Health@mander.xyz · 2 months ago

cross-posted to:
enshitification@slrpnk.net

An influx of cash would help stabilize rural health systems, but the program’s focus on technology may leave other major issues unaddressed.

You must log in or # to comment.

Chat

Public Health@mander.xyz

publichealth@mander.xyz

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !publichealth@mander.xyz

For issues concerning:

Public Health
Global Health
Health Systems & Policy
Environmental Health
Epidemiology
etc.

🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.

Related Communities

Medical Community Hub
Medicine
Medicine Canada
Premed
Premed Canada
Public Health (📍)

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)

Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

16 users / day
326 users / week
949 users / month
2.76K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
1.83K subscribers
1.11K Posts
2.19K Comments
Modlog