Within Russia, the war has come under growing criticism as Ukraine has ramped up strikes inside the country and Russian casualties keep growing … These deadly attacks are a ‘sign of desperation’ as Putin is realising he might not win the war.

Here is an Invidious alt for the video (4 min) inside the linked article.

Archived

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    I hope he fails to understand before Ukraine captures him, and broadcasts an official execution, on live television. He shouldn’t be allowed to escape retribution for the wrongs he has committed.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder if Putin realizes he is making history as one of russia’s dumbest leaders who threw away the nation’s future?

    Or does he still believe he hasn’t missed the optimum moment to end the war by miles and miles and now he is desperately looking for road signs long gone?

    • tardigrade@scribe.disroot.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess we ordinary Joes (and Jills) can’t understand what’s in the heads of the so-called world leaders like Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and others. Not because they are so bright (I doubt they even reach the average), but because they have been surrounding themselves for decades with yay sayers only, while everyone with even a slightly different opinion has long (been?) gone. They completely lost touch with the world in my opinion.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Winnie the Pooh actually seems competent. An unmitigated, spherical SOB, but competent.

        • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Putin seemed like one of the most competent and wily world leaders from 2000 to early 2022.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Winnie the poo has spent that 15 years taking out any threats to his rule. All that is left are yes men. It’s reported that he didn’t know about the rolling blackouts China was experiencing several years ago until someone from a US delegation asked him about them.

          He’s killed the messenger soo many times that no one wants deliver the message let alone advise him on the best course of action. He may be smart with good political skills but he can’t be an expert on everything.

        • 0x0@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Winnie Xinnie the Pooh actually seems competent. An unmitigated, spherical SOB, but competent.

        • Eril@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          So far. Putin also looked not as bad as today before he started messing with Ukraine. I think the same base applies here. We also have no idea what is going on in the head of Winnie and should they actually decide to attack Taiwan it would get more obvious.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      He’s just a continuation of the Tsar’s expansionist policy as well as treating the population as disposable. I don’t know if that makes him the dumbest, Russia has had some pretty horrendous leaders.

    • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is all opinion and I may be misinformed, so take it with a grain of salt.

      It is really sad when you think about how the beginning of the new millennium seemed an optimistic time in Russia when the economy was starting to pick up—albeit mostly in the wealthier western cities—but then Crimea happens and the recovery stalls under global sanctions. He should’ve got the message at that point, but no. He’s such a cold warrior. He can’t see any way for Russia to grow other than through conquest and putting in puppet governments everywhere.

      And the worst part is now, he has no incentive to end this war. It’s the only thing that’s keeping him alive. Ending it would be political suicide, and failed leaders tend to have a very short life expectancy. So he’s all paranoid and bunkered up. Actually, not even paranoid. He really does have reason to fear for his life.

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think the one thing you got wrong is that the invasion of Crimea was a response to economic troubles, not the cause of it.

        Russia spent ten years doing what the IMF said, which was essentially implementing Reaganomics. That could not work for the same reasons as it didn’t work in the Western world, long term. But short term, after Putin took power, it started generating results. Privatization led to industrial resurgence and a generally favorable climate for fossil fuels pumped money into the economy.

        After ten years, it was becoming painfully obvious that Russia was rich, but Russians started to be poor. So Putin started blaming NATO, the EU, and the West in general for hardship, like all fascists do when they are running out of excuses.

        Invading Crimea was a way to give Russians a reason to suffer through the economic pain. Just like in current America, the economic pain could not be fixed, because the oligarchs were sucking up all the money. It may be a little more complicated than that, as the Crimea invasion was also a crime of opportunity, after Ukraine had shaken off a Russian puppet government.

        • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ok fair enough. But Crimea did not seem to improve the situation for Russia. Like sanctions aside, taking the most pro-Russia-polling part of the country out of the electorate would obviously swing the remainder in a pro-European direction, but he doesn’t seem to understand how democracy works?

          • manxu@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 days ago

            I am not sure Putin understands that democracy works, at all. He seems to think it’s just a formality on the way to getting what he wants. A nice flourish for simple minds that believe in hogwash like “equality” and “freedom”. Whatever those words mean. Eye roll.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      We’ll be okay when Steiner cuts off the red army!

      These people are narcissists, they cannot think otherwise than exclusively of themselves. Putin will continue until his, probably forced, demise.

      Or so is my prediction (this year? Maybe/high probability).

      (My english sucks this morning, it’s the heatwave, sorry).

  • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Whenever nations start ridiculous wars of aggression and get their shit kicked in, they should lose a fuck ton of territory to the defending nation. It would be funny as hell if Ukraine doubled in size. And that’s an excellent reason, isn’t it?

    • Barbarossa@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trouble with that is they inherit a bunch of propagandized people with that territory, that’s no good for their elections.

      • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I suppose that’s true. I just think that there should some sort of semi-permanent punishment for a nation purposefully murdering the citizens of another in order to steal their land. If a nation is attempting to gain territory through violent means and ends up losing it instead, then I see that as a fitting punishment.

        • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          there should some sort of semi-permanent punishment for a nation purposefully murdering the citizens of another in order to steal their land

          Easy, the leaders of that nation should be executed.

          • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            Personal consequences for the powerful making fucked up decisions certainly dissuades similar behaviors in the future, but this is not the only thing that should happen. The people that have suffered should receive a tangible benefit of some kind.

        • Barbarossa@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          It certainly would be deliciously ironic for them to lose land in a war of conquest, but sanctions until they make tangible reparations to rebuilding the country they invade is a little more practical

          • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re right, it’s mostly just a thought that I had. I think it’s unlikely that they’re awarded any more than Crimea as far as land goes.

        • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Historically, that’s typically what happened. If the aggressor was beaten back, the defender could decide to push them a little extra back and grab some land or a “buffer zone”. Some years later, the aggressor is mad that they lost land, and have constructed a story about how they were the victims (after all, they’re the ones that ended up losing land). Of course, they need to “retake their stolen land”, so you get a new war. Rinse and repeat every couple decades, and you have European history up until about 1945.

          • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            You are correct. If and when reparations are decided they will most likely be monetary. I mostly like the irony, but that doesn’t make it the best option available.

            • Goodeye8@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              If the attacking country is a nuclear country they need to give some of their nuclear arsenal away.