It’s no secret that I’m a fan of developmental psychologist Candice Odgers. I’ve mentioned her and her work on the site many times, and she was a guest on my podcast as well. She …
Cool freedom internet -> lets chase ease of use and mass appeal -> every tom dick johanne and susy join -> shitpost facebook internet
Cool freedom internet -> requires using SOME modicum of brain power and ability -> Cool freedom internet
on a serious note, in a lot of these discussions you all start with the assumption that the masses want a freedom net and can handle a freedom net. you just need to look at the current internet fully supported by and shaped by the masses choices to understand why that is faulty.
No one forced mass social media adoption, it was willingly chosen, and continues to be chosen despite the known and publicized(mainstream news) dangers/issues
the ability to exit back to personal sites, etc was always there. inb4 “people have no personal responsibility and they were held at gunpoint”
so let people sit in their piss pool happily, stop trying to advocate for them, the ones that truly want change will make it happen.
In comparison, the daily time spent with social media in the U.S. was just 2 hours and 16 minutes.
so you’re telling me people can spend 2 hours a day on social media, but cant take the time to learn “pip install” to gain back their tech sovereignty, that they supposedly care about, do they even care???
Personally I favor destruction and replacement of the corporate web over the hypothetical integrity of a non facebook shitpost internet, and the former requires mass adoption. Whatever people happen to care about and prefer, that’s what is there to work with, and taking an instrumental approach to getting their attention and building their habits is how mass social media adoption was achieved.
That said, I’m reading about Reticulum and it looks like the first thing it’s trying to be is an underlying software library that other applications can be built on top of, and has pretty sensible priorities, so it’s fine if a really streamlined user experience for it doesn’t exist yet, that doesn’t need to be the very first step.
Cool freedom internet -> lets chase ease of use and mass appeal -> every tom dick johanne and susy join -> shitpost facebook internet
Cool freedom internet -> requires using SOME modicum of brain power and ability -> Cool freedom internet
on a serious note, in a lot of these discussions you all start with the assumption that the masses want a freedom net and can handle a freedom net. you just need to look at the current internet fully supported by and shaped by the masses choices to understand why that is faulty.
No one forced mass social media adoption, it was willingly chosen, and continues to be chosen despite the known and publicized(mainstream news) dangers/issues
the ability to exit back to personal sites, etc was always there. inb4 “people have no personal responsibility and they were held at gunpoint”
so let people sit in their piss pool happily, stop trying to advocate for them, the ones that truly want change will make it happen.
so you’re telling me people can spend 2 hours a day on social media, but cant take the time to learn “pip install” to gain back their tech sovereignty, that they supposedly care about, do they even care???
Personally I favor destruction and replacement of the corporate web over the hypothetical integrity of a non facebook shitpost internet, and the former requires mass adoption. Whatever people happen to care about and prefer, that’s what is there to work with, and taking an instrumental approach to getting their attention and building their habits is how mass social media adoption was achieved.
That said, I’m reading about Reticulum and it looks like the first thing it’s trying to be is an underlying software library that other applications can be built on top of, and has pretty sensible priorities, so it’s fine if a really streamlined user experience for it doesn’t exist yet, that doesn’t need to be the very first step.