If it is, at least they bothered to put a different font on the text than the usual for ChatGPT comics. The woman being drawn identically in the second panel except for the eyes is also a point against it being AI.

Browsing Lemmy by only what you have subscribed to is not as viable as on Reddit because there is generally less content per community.

Someone’s gotta stay behind to tell people to check out Lemmy

Drugs people use illegally have overlap with drugs prescribed as medicine, like amphetamines for adhd and opioids for pain management. Who gets to decide what is healthcare on behalf of the individual? Doctors, parents, governments, insurance companies? There is a lot of room between them to get it wrong. In all of these cases authorities are claiming to be protecting people from making what they say is the wrong choice. Of course it is in some cases, and parents probably should be pressuring their children not to take dangerous drugs, especially for reasons that are not healthcare. But if there are authorities that deny that something is healthcare, and that’s contested, “my body, my choice” is a slogan that implies it should be the individual that decides.

Your arm’s off

Makes sense, I have an account because it’s fun to collect the free games even if I never play them, but I can’t see myself spending money there.

I keep them, but I also bought a set of all the different sizes of allen wrench so they are now redundant

Yeah but they externalize it as an “addiction” and want to think of their actions as being someone else’s responsibility

Did he? I read the article and it seemed to omit any mention of that. It’s kind of implied by the word ‘deepfake’ but the exact role AI may have had here is not clear to me.

They’ve admitted what they really want is to outright ban porn, so it’s all just trying to push it as close to that as they can get

https://archive.is/20260109153317/https://www.newscientist.com/article/2510789-man-whose-gut-made-its-own-alcohol-gets-relief-from-faecal-transplant/

she said her boyfriend created an AI-generated text that called him names and made disparaging comments.

Do you really need AI for that

It does indirectly; if there is a trend of glitter bombs that causes the sales of glitter to go up 100% over a sustained period, then those people will likely decide to manufacture more, because making decisions that way is their job. Are you trying to say that their decisions have moral weight here while the consumer’s decisions do not? Or are you trying to say that how much glitter is purchased literally does not impact how much is produced? I could see how someone might argue for the former even though I disagree, but I’m pretty sure the latter is just not the truth.

Would the default instance be run by the app dev? Or in collaboration with some instance? It would maybe be risky to do with an unaffiliated instance because if they didn’t like it they could disallow these types of accounts or signups.

But it’s also important to remember you’re throwing radio signals out, you can be tracked by that if someone is determined.

Of course. I was thinking more about a situation where it can be inferred based on things someone has said online about their use of this kind of device and has said about their general location that a particular node is at their home and that is their address (or one of only a few possibilities). Sounds like it’s got that taken care of.

wdym

The idea of a “documentation moat” seems really gross to me. Like you’re going to make it more difficult on purpose for people to interact with your software, unless they pay?

Are you automatically included in online maps? Seems like it would mean a little more privacy if not

Doesn’t it? More people buying -> more being manufactured?

He did some vivisection based experiments on dogs that were kind of horrific iirc