- cross-posted to:
- nottheonion@sh.itjust.works
- notnottheonion@lemmy.cafe
- cross-posted to:
- nottheonion@sh.itjust.works
- notnottheonion@lemmy.cafe
I dont think you can fix this kind of crazy. What’s worse is this person has money, power and influence.
I’m sorry but treating dating as a sport is pretty much the epitome of what’s wrong with society today
The article saying she cannot get many second dates. You are so obtuse and annoying that even being rich and gorgeous isnt doing it for even shallow people.
AI use is the stupid person’s shibboleth.
Who knows what kind of messaging is really behind this? Imagine you’re in a cult that believes if public-private partnerships don’t proprietarily monopolize the entire AI industry worldwide, DeepSeek will turn everyone into bone paperclips & jerky. It would be easy to justify a prank that also conveniently captures the attention of a widely romantically-deranged society to save
your stockthe universe & stay in people’s brains. Hell I bet they’re coaxing those guys that do the shooting on purpose. They’ve probably got 300 guys in Nigeria right now pretending to be God speaking through ChatGPT to find the next Great Crashout victim. Just a thought really.
If anthropic was worth anything at all as a life coach, when asked how she did on the date it would tell her she was awful. No one wants to be recorded and the only people that would find this acceptable wouldn’t be worth dating.
I experienced the worst kiss in my life on a first (and last) date, and that’s not feedback Claude could have provided her.
and the only people that would find this acceptable wouldn’t be worth dating.
For her it seems to be a requirement so it’s a great filter.
Who is this?
what a time to be alive
So a few dates in does she still record to ask claude how she performed in bed?

And she would pay for that service if it gave her feedback at the end no doubt. Straight up cultists worshiping their “all-knowing” AI god and begging it for wisdom and instruction on everything like a helpless child.
I’m not attributing who said what
The resulting analysis must be pretty informative without attributing who said what… Maybe it’s one of those word collages where it shows word frequencies with bigger fonts





