• Zombie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    il y a 5 jours

    That’s unfortunately not how critical evaluation of information works.

    An account belongs to a person and therefore has a reputation. In some people’s eyes this person holds a higher reputation than The Guardian.

    You see the issue? And again, there’s no source to the tweet, it’s just a screenshot.

    Here’s an alternative source, as you have an aversion towards The Guardian despite it backing you up in this case:

    https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/172873

    https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/172876

      • Zombie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        il y a 5 jours

        I’m not criticising. I’m trying to help, you dafty!

        In the information age, and especially on a highly propagandised and emotionally charged topic like Israel/Palestine. None of us should be taking the face value of a screenshot without a source. I provided a source that backed up what your screenshot says. I chose The Guardian because it was the only news source I found without having to go onto X, because I have no interest in using that website if I can avoid it. Maybe in future you could source your screenshots so this waste of time doesn’t happen again.

        No good deed goes unpunished I guess.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          il y a 5 jours

          I’m just trying to explain that Twitter users can also be reliable sources, no offense to you or anything.