• badgermurphy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    The thing with network-connected components is that who they can talk to and what data they can correlate is almost entirely a function of software and configuration. The Axon cameras today could be part of a national network tomorrow if the company were so inclined.

    This is a company. If that company believes it can make more money by pushing an invasive, legal, software update, they’re very likely to do that. The fact that they’re touting the fact that they don’t do that is not an ethical stance, it’s a marketing strategy.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Oh, it’s 100% a marketing strategy now.

      My guess is that they simply didn’t have their shit together to build out a national network, and product development incompetence accidentally created a desirable “feature.”

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Axon absolutely has their shit together, they’re just better at manipulating the public than Flock. They managed to invent an entire fake medical condition that is accepted by the courts and public as real, just to avoid consequences from their defective products and false advertising. Look up “excited delirium”.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, Flock’s PR has been pretty bad. I don’t know who is leading their media strategy there, but they’re clearly doing some rookie stuff like calling opponents terrorists and whatnot.