Interesting article with some info I didn’t know about Flock. It feels like surveillance is increasing so quickly these days 🫠

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    A small thing keeps getting mentioned, but not explained. These things maintain a ‘whitelist’ of license plates they’ll ‘ignore.’

    Why? Who is on that list? And who gets to decide what licenses are placed on the list? Are these logged and audited?

    • Carmakazi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 day ago

      If there is no explanation one must assume the worst interpretation.

      Wealthy connected people. The police who ultimately manage the local contracts with Flock. Federal agents and their ancillaries.

      Why? “Because fuck you, we’re your betters. Keep your nose down, citizen.”

      • dmir@gehirneimer.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Pretty much this. I’ve been living under authoritarianism my whole life and such things are just clear as day.

        Same reason so many social media or tech CEOs don’t really let their kids use the product: they know it sucks and it’s not good for you nor does it respect you or your data, they know how important privacy is - just not for you your privacy and data.

      • lyrial@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The same assholes that get those cards/coins etc. to hand to cops to explain that they can’t be pulled over.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    Flock Safety has told the public for years that its technology “cannot recognize, identify, or track individuals.”

    But that’s, like, the only thing it does, though…

  • aev_software@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I received a job offer to work at Flock, as a security architect ensuring tenants don’t see each other’s videos… I’m declining. Flock it.

    • PurpleFox@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yessss nice! But I wouldn’t blame you at all if you decided to get that bag. Times be tough

      • dmir@gehirneimer.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Times are tough, but I think a security architect is one of the positions that lets you choose an employer based on morals as well, because it pays well, and if Flock is already considering you, you probably have experience and money to pursue some integrity.

      • distal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I don’t know. There’re limits to what can be considered an acceptable hustle imo. I get the whole American thing about not judging what someone works. but you gotta cut it at elbit systems or ICE.

        • PurpleFox@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Yeah, I do agree for the most part. I think anyone who has the option should avoid working at these places.

          But I guess I just don’t have a fully formed opinion about whether it’s less moral to work for an evil org or to throw away a chance to support loved ones. I’m tripped up by the hypothetical scenario where a job is the difference for someone’s ability to put a roof over their children’s heads.

          • distal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It’s essentially this “conundrum”:

            Work somewhere for the next two years and be able to lead what would’ve been middle class life 20 years ago. But your actions will be destructive.

            Or decline to do that and try to get by living a less comfortable life which destroys less in the end.

            I think the choice is clear. Other people have loved and just because you don’t know them doesn’t mean it’s more “moral” to hurt them, which is what I am getting at when saying that one’s actions are harmful.