• piccolo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      For a long time “$60” was the standard for releases. Then nintendo was like “we go to adjust for inflation”. But spoilers, they never lower the price on their 1st party games ever. Botw, a 10 year old game is retailing for $70.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Inflation outpaces wages. You have to also convert those into modern dollars to get a better idea of the cost of things for the average consumer.

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        All these calculations are skewed by the increase in housing costs that have outpaced other inflation calculations.

        For the median and poor this has a much larger and unacknowledged effect, creating more price pressures for average people than basic inflation reporting depicts.

  • cRazi_man
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Also: everyone buys them anyway, so why wouldn’t they charge as much as possible?

    • deft@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is the truth.

      The price is ridiculous but why lower it? It sells. That’s a key point to capitalism. The argument about Nintendo “killing” other capitalist endeavors is just so weak in the face of that. Indie games are king right now, steam is probably the biggest distributor right now. It has nothing to do with competition, it’s all demand.

  • graphito@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bruh, you really need to shorten up your populism. “Capital bad” shouldn’t take such of a long winded paragraph