• CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Very dubious of this technology. It would take an insane amount of energy to spin it up, a near perfect vacuum, and put incredible stress (something like 10k G’s!) on whatever is being accelerated. On top of that, it would have the most velocity at the lowest elevation, where the atmosphere is thickest.

    I would love to hear that they make it work, but wouldn’t put my money behind it.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Not only that, but you need to accelerate at or near apogee in order to achieve orbit or your path will be ballistic and you’re going to hit the ground again. That’s a fact of physics that can’t be changed. Something without an engine or fuel can’t do that.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They haven’t launched anything into orbit, yet. And entire concept smells of tech-bro grift.

  • edupo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    How enabling big corps to fill the sky with garbage and surveillance cheaply is good news?