Summary

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faces mounting pressure from House Democrats to resign his leadership position after supporting a Republican government funding bill that most House Democrats opposed.

Representatives Delia Ramirez, Glenn Ivey, and the liberal group Indivisible have publicly called for his resignation, with more lawmakers potentially following suit.

Critics argue Schumer betrayed House Democrats by not fighting against a bill that failed to protect agencies from DOGE cuts, while Schumer maintains avoiding a shutdown was necessary to prevent Trump from downsizing government more rapidly.

  • TemplaerDude@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    He’s a loser. The Democratic party is full of losers. They lose election after election and still the same losers keep running the ship.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    However seeing as he couldn’t give less of a shit what democrats want will choose to remain in office as Republicans request

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    SENATE leader faces pressure from HOUSE Democrats” sounds great until you realize they have no means to force it to happen because they’re in the other chamber of Congress.

    I want to know where the fuck is the “pressure” from other Democratic Senators who could actually apply consequences!

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s still good for the House Dems to be doing this, though, calling attention to the problem so more people will call their Dem senators demanding that they take action as well.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sure, it doesn’t hurt, but House Democrats’ focus should be on denouncing the quislings in their own chamber, since those are the ones they have the power to apply consequences to.

        If that’s happening, I haven’t read any news about it.

        Otherwise, having the Democrats criticize only across chambers while remaining silent within them starts to feel more like a tactic of avoiding accountability than one of applying it.

        • leadore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Only one House Dem voted yes on it (Jared Golden of Maine). So it passed 217-213 because R’s have the majority and one of them defected as well. So House Dems are holding together pretty well, but as long as the R’s also hold together there’s nothing they can do to stop them.

          Only the Senate D’s could have stopped the bill, by voting against cloture (even though Dems are in the minority, cloture requires 60 votes). But not only Schumer but 9 other quislings (8 D’s and 1 I) voted with the fascists. List of them here. But Schumer is Leader so if he had taken a stand against it, probably some of those other 9 would have followed his lead and it could have been stopped.

    • GuidoSarducci@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I want to know where the fuck is the “pressure” from other Democratic Senators who could actually apply consequences!

      too busy clutching pearls and massaging their stock portfolios

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m surprised that Sanders is older than both Trump and Biden but retains about twice as much virility as either of them and about four times as much sanity as Trump

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not being a piece of shit tends to have a positive impact on the longevity of your brain, it seems. Yes, I’m calling Biden a piece of shit too.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Biden is like Zaphod Bebblebrox, he had his brain split into two. But the older he gets the less he can control which part is talking.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It kills me because he did have a heart issue during the 2020 campaign and it really did kill some momentum he had. But obviously it didn’t last in any substantive way.

        • Chris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The DNC would never let him. That’s the world we are in. The nominal opposition party is too concerned with fundraising and just not being the fascist party to do a damn thing.

          We need a leftist tea party or a new party. Both are huge hills to climb, but I don’t see the Democrats doing shit.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            DNC plan is to swoop in at election time with a batch of zionist war criminal candidates who offer to shit the bed 5% less than trump does, and see if that works.

            I wish I was joking but thats literally their plan. Wait for trump to irritate us enough to accept what the donors want without any changes. They learned absolutely nothing in the past 2 decades.

            • Formfiller@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              The Tea Party movement was well funded to distract from the real working class people’s movement the Occupy Wall Street movement

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Bernie isn’t a Democrat, there’s zero possibility that Senate Democrats would choose him to be their leader.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Remember, it’s not just about policy.

    Schumer publicly said he would support the shutdown, the privately lead a (very) small group of congressional democrats to vote for cloture. he basically led a mutiny against against the senate democrats he purportedly leads.

    How can anyone- never mind fellow senators, and representatives- trust him to follow through?

  • Chris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s worth discussing what Trump would do with a government shutdown, but Schumer seems so out of touch.

    Why can’t AOC’s politics take hold 😞

  • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Schumer is right. A shut down would have allowed trump to enact emergency powers and then there would be no further votes.

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      trump is going ahead and doing whatever he wants anyway, regardless of laws or court orders, with the full support of the R party which is in the majority in both Houses anyway.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Schumer was faced with a lose-lose, so he chose the losier-lose of agreeing with the Pricktator rather than the winnier-won of fighting fascism.

    I think I alliterated all over myself.

  • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    " they were not fooled by the vote for it on cloture and vote against it on final passage."

    I love how they’re openly admitting this is a trick now, when so many Blue MAGA people fell all over themselves to justify it when they’ve done it in the past.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    If we are deporting random people for nonsense reasons, how do we add Schumer to that list? I heard him utter some antisemitic things, I swear. I felt threatened on semites behalf and laws are laws, right.

    /s I’m just kidding, about “laws being laws”

  • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wondering, could it be some high stakes gamble by Schumer - let the Republicans gut SS and Medicare in the hopes of picking up massive support in the midterms? If it goes wrong and there isn’t a surge in support, then only 10 Dems ate exposed to voter wrath, and how many of the 10 are up for re-election soon?

    • oyo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The thing is, he’s playing chess while the Republicans don’t give a fuck what chess is and are just flipping all the tables with games on them.

        • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I would say that is unlikely.

          I work with a lot of really really old CPAs and lawyers, and they are just completely delusional about how hard things really are for younger generations.

          “Have you tried working harder?”

          “How come you haven’t bought a house? We pay you [not] well!”

          “My children are struggling too, I had to buy each of them their homes. Maybe ask your [destitute] parents for help?”

          “Back in my day, we worked so much harder. You guys have it so easy! By the way, I cannot open this PDF and I need you to work 70hrs this week.”

          “There is a right way to doing things-- even if that way completely fucks you over because you have no labor protections.”

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Torn on this. I see Schumer’s point that shutdown could be riskier, but I also feel the Democrats need to do fucking something to resist the ruling party.

    • tortina_original@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I must be stupid.

      If Maga wanted a shutdown (because Trump could “do things”), what stops them from voting “no” themselves and getting the shutdown they so desperately want? Nothing makes sense anymore.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because it’s win/win for them. And if they voted against the shutdown, and it happened, they can blame Democrats (they would anyway, but this would lend credence).

        Either way, they continue to cripple our federal government.