• bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I believe it. Cyclists here are not required to stop for stop signs. Also, most cars just slow down when the intersection is empty.

    • Dale@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not where I live. Also how would that make sense? It’s a four-way intersection of car traffic if you blow through it at the wrong time you die.

      • django@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You may be confusing “stopping” and “slowing down”. You can do the second without the first.

      • MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Several states in the US have laws on the books allowing bikers to conditionally ignore stop signs, but typically to “downgrade” a stop sign to a yield sign. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_stop

        The basic premise is that because a bike is slow enough, and the stopping distance of a bike at speed is short enough, a bike can approach an intersection, make a judgment call on if they need to stop, and if they don’t expect to get hit, they can cross without coming to a full stop first like a car does.

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s generally treated as a yield in states where bikes don’t have to stop at stop signs. If there’s no cars or other bikes, they go. Obviously you still stop if other cars/bikes are approaching a four way or are in the intersection.