• agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Completely untrue.

    The environmental impact would still be as bad, it would still spout out misinformation, it would still scrape for art against people’s will, the images would still be shit and not art anyway, and would still make an intellectual sinkhole.

    • seeigel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      If society isn’t built around competition and exploitation, the usage of AI can be limited to renewable energy. Whereas now, every gram of hydrocarbon and uranium will be burned to win the race for global domination.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Great you ignored my other issues with that, but also you don’t think people would collectively be using those resources? Also the water used for those ai servers isn’t great.

        • seeigel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          I agree with your other points.

          It depends on the type of society if people use all those resources. With AI they will use them much, much faster.

          Water doesn’t have to be a problem in places where there is enough water.

            • seeigel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Can you tell me the time of the relevant argument, please.

              Otherwise I would think that global warming leads to warmer oceans which should cause more evaporation and rain.

              • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                Ok, let me explain it simply then.

                You remember the water cycle from elementary school? You just described it. Well, there isn’t an infinite amount of water on earth. So when you take water out of the water cycle and lock it away, like in jugs of water or in cooling systems for massive computers, it doesn’t get evaporated and return to the environment. It stays in its jug.

                So the more people store water away, the less water we have to use elsewhere.

                As for the timeline, this is already happening now.

                They go into more detail in the video. It’s long but it is funny.

                • seeigel@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Sorry but that humor is not my style. I would be glad if you could tell me the relevant moments.

                  Locking all water away, how is that possible? Have you seen the size of the Pacific?

                  • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    16 days ago

                    I’d suggest watching the video if you want more details, but the amount of freshwater we can use is much smaller than the oceans.