UltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 1 year agoPhotographer Disqualified from AI image contest after winning with real photolemmy.worldimagemessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imagePhotographer Disqualified from AI image contest after winning with real photolemmy.worldUltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square4linkfedilinkfile-text
https://petapixel.com/2024/06/12/photographer-disqualified-from-ai-image-contest-after-winning-with-real-photo/
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoHe should have been disqualified. The photo contest was specifically for AI generated images. Categories on competitions exist, and if you enter something outside of that category, it should be disqualified.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoHe was disqualified. That’s not the point.
minus-squaredogsoahC@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoWhat is the point then? (Sorry if it’s explained in the linked article, I don’t have time to read that rn, maybe later.)
minus-squareReiRose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThe point the photographer claims they were making is that real is better than AI and creatives are better than programs.
He should have been disqualified. The photo contest was specifically for AI generated images.
Categories on competitions exist, and if you enter something outside of that category, it should be disqualified.
He was disqualified. That’s not the point.
What is the point then? (Sorry if it’s explained in the linked article, I don’t have time to read that rn, maybe later.)
The point the photographer claims they were making is that real is better than AI and creatives are better than programs.