• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I love how you completely avoided all of my points, only to say that you have a few communist friends so that makes you not an anti-communist. We have no way of knowing if your friends have views in line with the vast majority of communists, what tendency they follow, etc. It’s just a way for you to dodge the argument entirely and never need to question your preconcieved biases.

      Nico198X (noun): a person who ties themselves in knots so they can feel good about supporting authoritarian despots while wearing a red scarf.

      See? I can make lazy ad-hominems too, it doesn’t actually address the arguments at hand.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The one who lacks reading comprehension is you. No one needs your approval or vetting. I am simply stating that if the broad majority of communists globally agree with me, then the specific issues you take with me that also apply to the broad majority of communists go hand in hand as you being anti-communist. It isn’t about definition, nor do I claim a higher authority, I claim that my views are very standard for communists and as such calling me a pejorative for communist makes you to an extent anti-communist.

          It is lazy ad-hominem. You’re directly trying to undermine my points by attacking my character. That’s what you came here to do, attack my character to prevent people from responding. It’s childish, and now that it evidently isn’t working, you’re trying to get in a few quick jabs on your way out.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              This is really getting sad, you’re starting to mald, cope, and seethe because nobody is agreeing with you. I hold similar views to the majority of Marxist-Leninists on Stalin, Mao, and the Kim family.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I’m worse than you feared because I’m what I’ve said I was the entire time? A Marxist-Leninist? How is this not an admission of anti-communism?

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              The US literally has a higher incarceration rate than China or than USSR did under Stalin, but do go on. Really highlighting the quality of your intellect here.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  No we are literally talking about that right now because you’re braying about gulags here. Also, learn what ad hominem is if you’re going to use it. Ad hominem would be me saying your argument is wrong because you’re an imbecile. I’m addressing your argument directly on its own merits while highlighting the fact that you are in fact an imbecile. It’s perhaps too subtle a difference for you to grasp given the limitations.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          More ad-hominem. Rather than explaining why the points are “bullshit,” you just attack me personally and make excuses for why you can’t respond.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s absolutely an attack on my character, you opened this conversation attacking me with an anti-communist pejorative and have refused to engage with my points, preferring to just call them “divorced from reality” and “vacuous nonsense” as though those rhetorical attacks erase the points raised.

              I backed up why I said all states are authoritarian: all are instruments by which the ruling class oppresses others and retains control, and the degree to which it oppresses is aligned with the degree to which it is opposed. I even used Germany as an example, Nazi Germany wasn’t more oppressive because they wanted to be, but because the bourgeoisie was responding to a crisis in their mode of production and needed to violently assert itself, but the mode of production fundamentally did not change.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  “Tankie” is absolutely an anti-communist pejorative, it’s used for the same people that have been called “reds,” “pinkos,” “commies,” etc. It’s levied at supporters of existing socialist systems, which includes the likes of W.E.B. Dubois, Nelson Mandela, Fanon, Malcolm X, etc.

                  As for saying all states are authoritarian, I did prove it. Do you disagree with the notion that all states are elements of class oppression, and that whichever class controls the state oppresses the rest? That’s the standard Marxist position, which since you’re not a Marxist it’s understandable that you wouldn’t, but it would be best for you to be honest about your anti-communism.

                  i suspect you will say they exist to the extent that they are not a threat to the capitalists, but will be crushed if they were to actually gain power.

                  I actually agree with this, yes.

                  then i’d say you’d still need to prove that also, but first, how about getting a populace to actually vote for your views and win elections before crying foul.

                  Why would Marxists try to accomplish something proven to never work in theory nor in practice? The principles of Marxism are to unite unity and practice, learn from the past and apply it to the present. Why would we not learn from the failures of electoral socialism learned by the coup against Salvador Allende in Chile? Why would we not learn from the success of revolutionaries?

    • Kras Mazov@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Western Marxist try not to side with the empire and believe their lies challenge (impossible)