In a public memo issued by the General Services Administration, the federal government no longer prohibits contractors from having segregated waiting rooms, restaurants, and water fountains.

The memo specifically read, “When issuing new solicitations or contracts do not include any of the following provisions and clauses… Prohibition of Segregated Facilities.”

The repealed “segregation clause” was prompted by President Donald Trump’s executive order on DEI, which also rescinded President Lyndon B. Johnson’s 1965 order that provided “equal opportunity in Federal employment"

The clause (THIS was taken OUT) reads, “The Contractor agrees that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its employees any segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and that it does not and will not permit its employees to perform their services at any location under its control where segregated facilities are maintained.”

    • mspencer712@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Unfortunately true. It’s disturbing to see the non-policy-related causes from that page:

      Police discrimination (a crime)

      Vandalism (a crime)

      Discriminatory housing practices (currently a crime)

      Gentrification (a market effect)

      Supplemented with actual policy change. They don’t need the help.

      In this age of ubiquitous phone cameras and instant social judgement, I look forward to the backlash as racists reveal themselves.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      In 2019, sociologist Heather O’Connell wrote that sundown towns are “(primarily) a thing of the past”.[25] However, historian James W. Loewen notes persisting effects of sundown towns’ violently enforced segregation even after they may have been integrated to a small degree, a phenomenon he called “second-generation sundown towns.”

      I don’t see anything in the linked article to suggest we “still have fucking sundown towns.”

      • mspencer712@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Look instead for the reported causes. The effect “is sundown town or not” might be difficult to conclusively prove or disprove. The causes are sometimes documented though.

    • BetaBlake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ugh that’s such an overblown stereotype, sure Podunk shit hole towns in the middle of nowhere arent fun to be in, but they’re mentioned so much on here and reddit like it’s some commonplace landscape that you’ve got to avoid at all costs.

      The reality is you’d have to go out of your way to go to these places, they’ve always sucked and they’ll always suck. That’s self segregation not mandated segregation.

      • tomenzgg@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        That’s self segregation not mandated segregation.

        Lynching was often not mandated segregation, as well; 🙄. This is the problem when you don’t listen to the lived experiences of and lessons learned by marginalized people.

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    i live in the south, there is still a lot of unofficial segregation, specially in churches, but also in neighborhoods, bars, playgrounds and other places of gathering

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not just the South. Here’s the racial dot map for a so-called "integrated’ city in the midwest (Chicago):

      Compare that to the dot map for Atlanta:

      I don’t know about you, but I, for one, am not seeing an appreciable difference in the amount of non-homogeneous areas.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Last time he was president it was BLM and critical race theory. Now it’s woke and DEI. Doesn’t matter what it’s called it’s the exact same thing: If you’re not a white male they don’t think you matter. And in a year it’ll be replaced with another acronym and everyone will forget about DEI just like they forgot about all the others.

    • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh, you think they forgot about CRT? They did not. They have funneled CRT into “woke and DEI”, and they are still very pissed off about the Civil Rights movement to start with. Now that they will start leveraging the anti-Christian bias thing against gay marriage and muslims, it will all fall into place. Rest assured.

  • flashpanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    So the clause, 52.222-21 Prohibition of Segregated Facilities was removed but I think it’s because under the definitions of that clause it defines “Gender Identity” and “Sexual Orientation”. Most of the clauses removed or edited refer to one of these definitions. It feels like they Ctrl+f’ed the FAR to find any mention of gender. As someone who writes contracts for the government for a living, getting the email to say remove these clauses made me feel disgusting. I hate it here.