We are getting reports of YouTube rolling out an experiment to some accounts where normal videos only have DRM formats available on the tv (TVHTML5) Innertube client.

This is not limited to yt-dlp. Tests have been run with the same account on various official YouTube TV clients (PS3, web browser, apple tv) and they are also only getting DRM formats for videos.

We live in hell-world.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They do own them, though. That’s what happens when you upload content to Youtube. Or virtually any other website, for that matter.

      • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nope. The person who uploads the video owns the copyright/IP. Seems like they should have say in if theres DRM on their IP.

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah but the YT terms explicitly say that you give them a worldwide royalty free license to do whatever the fuck they want.

          Content creators have no say.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Peertube is f****** amazing, But your average windows user isn’t going to be able to manage the hosting. And your average ISP blocks standard hosting ports. Then it also requires the users to manage their own monetization.

      It’s not undoable but it is kind of a steep slope.

      • RiQuY@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can use an already hosted instance, there is no need to selfhost every service.

        • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think they were maybe speaking to the peer-to-peer “hosting” part of peertube. If not enough people are contributing to bandwidth, then more falls back to the server, increasing the cost to run it.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Mainly storage. The only reason these free hosted sites can stand up is because they have low traffic. If 0.01% of YouTubers started dumping all their video over there, they’d quickly run the free services out of town.

            Realistically, If it were easy enough for everyone to host locally (torrent style) and people paired up with hosting partners for backups, peertube could be an amazing Youtube alternative.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Everyone doesn’t have to host their own instance.

          They don’t, but how long do you think a free instance is going to last when it starts seeing serious volume. Video storage in the cloud is expensive AF.

          • uxellodunum@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Odysee did/does something interesting where if one uses the desktop client, the video gets streamed and cached, and then seeded back over a configurable amount of time. I could see creator’s communities being self-sustainable this way.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Odyssey was a technical failure. They pushed pretty hard to get the community into it but once it reached even a slightly elevated usage, They had to start standing up servers to back the swarm.

              I believe it can work but they didn’t crack the nut on that unfortunately, At least not before the SEC brok in and riped them a new one for selling securities basically destroyed the backing company.

      • kat@orbi.camp
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I joined it but the main feed was just a lot of NSFW content… So made it kind of awkward for discovery.

  • Majestic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Of course. The YT-DLP team by refusing to support DRM videos gave Google a huge neon sign that said this is the one thing that will shut them down, the line they won’t cross. Google has targeted the big front end instances with rate limits and blocks and this is the next step.

    Our only hope really is that the current YT-DLP team hands the reins over to people in countries that don’t give a shit about copyright and they put back in the ability to download and decrypt DRM protected video.

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, that’s basically how yt-dlp came to be. They took over when yt-download couldn’t keep up anymore. I hate this time, it will take a while until the best successor is found.

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      From yt-dlp’s software license:

      Anyone is free to copy, modify, publish, use, compile, sell, or distribute this software, either in source code form or as a compiled binary, for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial, and by any means.

    • RiQuY@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My only hope is that Google goes bankrupt and people migrate to other places, but sadly that’s not feasible atm.

      • 0range@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Google going bankrupt would almost certainly mean YouTube disappears. Which can happen, but it’s not a good thing

        • Fitzsimmons@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          In the good timeline, multiple governments and international organizations launch peertube servers.

          Probably not this timeline though.