• lerky@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Pffft, tourist. Read Mark Z. Danielewski’s “House of Leaves” and then we can talk footnotes.

        • clb92@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I’ll have to admit that I never got very far in it, but what I did read, I really liked. One day I’ll finish it… one day…

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Same.

        I read that book right after taking like English 400: Theory and Criticism, so I was like “yeah it has footnotes but doesn’t every book have footnotes?” Then I recommended it to a friend who hadn’t read a book more complex than harry potter in 20 years, and her brain like caught fire.

    • monotremata@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      There’s also “Book” by Robert Grudin. At one point

      spoiler

      there’s an uprising and the footnotes rebel against the plot.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This is a reference to the book, House of Leaves§ by Mark Z. Danielewski.

      §panda_abyss, in his seminal work on referring to House of Leaves, mentions this reference in the Lemmy Thread “3. DFW 4. ibid”.

      † I used to work as a tattoo artist you know.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The Denephew joke remains one of my all time favourites, and it was a footnote to a footnote.

  • psmgx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Man did that dude need an editor who could stand up to him.

    That said still liked infinite jest. His college graduation speech is also pretty good. Other stuff was hit or miss.

      • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        It’s worth the exercise IMO. Was in a similar boat, then picked it back up after a year and a bit and finished it. I was happy I did, it’s a great book.

        That said, if it doesn’t grab you, it doesn’t grab you. Nothing at all wrong with that, and it’s definitely not everyone’s cup of tea.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I’ve honestly been loving it so far! It’s just a much more dense read than my last book hahaha