He persecuted socialists (basically the first people sent to concentration camps) and had capitalist policies? Any reason to suggest he was fond of Marx?
But Mr (assumed) “proletarians_must_suffer” probably thinks that “socialism is when the state does stuff”.
Go bother someone else in some ancap forum, where you belong.
You agree that companies made profits. That’s a capitalist policy.
Considering what was before, it was a gradual step towards socialism. Nazi Germany existed for like 30 years. Not everything can be implemented immediately.
All socialists apply Marxist analysis at least partially
Considering what was before, it was a gradual step towards socialism. Nazi Germany existed for like 30 years.
Ah, yes. And Hitler clearly stated that he was a socialist… somewhere. You have to read between the lines of “Mein Kampf”, where he clearly states that he’s right wing. And all the companies who profited immensly from all that slave labour where juuuust about to be socialised. /s
Uhuh. Is Charles Fourier socialist?
Got any proper points, or are you just gonna “umm actually” me to death?
What is that even supposed to mean?
You’re a weirdo who deserves to be ridiculed for having such a stupid worldview.
Wie oft haben wir uns geschüttelt vor Lachen über diese einfältigen bürgerlichen Angsthasen, angesichts des geistvollen Rätselratens über unsere Herkunft, unsere Absichten und unser Ziel. Wir haben die rote Farbe unserer Plakate nach genauem und gründlichem Überlegen gewählt, um dadurch die linke Seite zu reizen, zur Empörung zu bringen und sie zu verleiten, in unsere Versammlungen zu kommen, wenn auch nur, um sie zu sprengen, damit wir auf diese Weise überhaupt mit den Leuten reden konnten.
They stated that as their goal. The Nazis stated a Reich enuring 1000 years as their goal. Did those succeed?
So unless someone achieves communism, they’re not a communist? Btw, since 3rd Reich didn’t follow all nazi tenants and didn’t achieve all nazi goals, maybe they weren’t nazis?
Name one socialist that came after Marx that doesn’t agree with him in some manner or the other
Hitler
Sorry, but you’ve set up this perfect punchline yourself.
Please, enlighten me
Oh, so you don’t know what my views are, but have already concluded they’re absurd. Well, jokes on you, I’m an anarcho communist (no)
Any reason to suggest he wasn’t socialist?
He persecuted socialists (basically the first people sent to concentration camps) and had capitalist policies? Any reason to suggest he was fond of Marx?
But Mr (assumed) “proletarians_must_suffer” probably thinks that “socialism is when the state does stuff”.
Go bother someone else in some ancap forum, where you belong.
Are bolsheviks socialist? Bc they also persecuted socialists, communists, anarchists, etc, etc.
He literally limited the profitability of companies to 6%.
He’s non-marxist socialist. Not all socialist are Marxists. Btw, fascists are Marxists. They’re what you call “revisionists”.
I’m not an ancap.
No. They were state-capitalists.
You agree that companies made profits. That’s a capitalist policy.
I didn’t say whether or not he was a Marxist. All socialists apply Marxist analysis at least partially. Even Bakunin agreed with Marx’s theory.
🤡
You’re enough of an ancap for me to care how you define yourself. You’ve proven enough how little of political/historical understanding you have.
Ok.
Considering what was before, it was a gradual step towards socialism. Nazi Germany existed for like 30 years. Not everything can be implemented immediately.
Uhuh. Is Charles Fourier socialist?
What is that even supposed to mean?
Ah, yes. And Hitler clearly stated that he was a socialist… somewhere. You have to read between the lines of “Mein Kampf”, where he clearly states that he’s right wing. And all the companies who profited immensly from all that slave labour where juuuust about to be socialised. /s
Got any proper points, or are you just gonna “umm actually” me to death?
You’re a weirdo who deserves to be ridiculed for having such a stupid worldview.
I didn’t say it. Although he did.
Where?
Btw are bolsheviks communists? Bc they clearly stated they are. No need to even read between the lines.
And what’s the relation between capitalism and slavery?
The point is that socialists can be socialists without applying Marx works in any way.
What worldview? What is my worldview?
Where? Here, maybe, where he ridicules the people who think the Nazis were socialists?
In this chapter, for example
They stated that as their goal. The Nazis stated a Reich enuring 1000 years as their goal. Did those succeed?
They’re compatible.
Name one socialist that came after Marx that doesn’t agree with him in some manner or the other.
Please, enlighten me. I could do with a bit of absurd fantasy worldbuilding.
So unless someone achieves communism, they’re not a communist? Btw, since 3rd Reich didn’t follow all nazi tenants and didn’t achieve all nazi goals, maybe they weren’t nazis?
Hitler
Sorry, but you’ve set up this perfect punchline yourself.
Oh, so you don’t know what my views are, but have already concluded they’re absurd. Well, jokes on you, I’m an anarcho communist (no)