Let’s try to get them to add “Kirkenuinely”!

Sweet

We let the few dominate and exploit the many. Our relationship with nature is refelective of our relationship with ourself.

But the cultural focuson domination and exploitation is not biological. It’s not in our nature. The potential to dominate is. But so is the potential of cooperation and mutual aid.

Let’s try to rethink our society and behaviour to nature and each other and aim for the latter. For all our sake.

#GoogleBookchin

I was criticising Germany and Israel. You’re talking about what people supporting Palestine supposedly want. So that’s already off-topic.

Palestine is the same thing. It’s a state for a certain ethnicity - Palestinians.

That would be correct, if I was advocating for a palestinian state, or a two-state-solution. I’m in fact in favour of the no-state solution for Palestine. If there has to be a state, then it clearly should be multi-national one (like Switzerland, or Lebanon).

Wanting Palestine to be free does not automatically mean that you want there to be a different state to brutalize the people.

Also, palestinians were already at least multi-religious. There are palestinian muslims, jews and christians. Israel binds it’s ethnic program to judaism.

And they too call for Palestinians to return to it.

Refugees have a right to have a historic wrong made right again. They mustn’t be kept from returning if they want.

But when it’s Palestine people call it national liberation.

You can (and should) also call for antinational liberation. Or even a global intifada (internationalist movemet). Both aren’t nationalist.

I simply think it’s somewhat stupid to criticise Israel for something (ethnostate = bad) when Palestine is basically doing the same thing.

What? Please tell me about the genocide Palestine is supposedly carrying out at the moment. You’re embarrassing yourself with that “both sides bad” platitude.

You get me?

Yeah. Cringe take, as I was afraid it would turn out to be.

Source?

So genau muss ich meinen Zimt-Süßholz-“Schokochai” alle zwei Wochen aber nicht dosieren. Und Ingwer trink ich mit Fruchtfleisch.

Postöpsel bestimmt.

Slop?

Please elaborate what you mean. I don’t get it.

If I’m understanding this sentence correctly, you are saying that modern state could exist without discriminating people regarding of their ethnicity.

No, I said that they state that this is what they do. I said that this was their claim. I didn’t claim that this was correct.

their [sic] is no scientific differences between nations, ethnicities or races.

That’s true. But the concept doesn’t have to be scientifically valid to be a reason for discrimination or privilege. Jim Crow and the Nuremberg race laws simply referred to what was considered race science at the time.

Nations are social construct,

True, but that doesn’t negate anything

usually based on genocide.

that’s sure as shit not how states present themselves, though.

Let’s take Germany as an example: There is a high percentage of german mitizens of Turkish decent who have been living in Germany for generations. Many of those people have German citizenship. Sure, there’s still racist discrimination going on, but these people are german, as far as the state is concerned. It’s actually illegal in Germany to discriminate people based on ethnicity, so technically, only the passport should be taken into consideration.

The meme is mainly based on how Germany presents itself.

States can have different aims of the structuie their peoples should have. Liberal capitalist states currently state that they ignore ethnicity in the makeup of their peoples, as long as they can help the nation in the international competition.

Nazi-Germany had a strong focus on having some sort of ethnic monoculture in the makeup of the German people.

Israel strait up states that it doesn’t value arabic lives and favours ashkenazi jews. They claim to be “the one jewish state” and actively draw jewish people to settle there.

No Rarity? :c

So, imagine an elephant in nature. The natural drive of the elephant to juggle will after a while lead to the development of circuses to facilitate the juggling elephants. Checkmate, socialists.

/j

Interpreter based firefox script?

Dazu passend die genannten [Die 15 witzigsten „Heimatstrom“-Memes – und wie sie Rechte entlarven](https://www.volksverpetzer.de/aktuelles/witzigsten-heimatstrom-memes/) beim Volksverpetzer.

Wo sind hier “Bausteine für ein Argument”? Und ich sehe keine konkret genannten Probleme, die gelöst werden sollen. Vielleicht sind sie für dich ja offensichtlich. Aber konkret genannt wurden sie bisher nicht.

Das Einzige, was ich als Problem in der “Diskussion” ausmachen könnte wäre “es gibt Menschen mit rechter Gesinnung, die nicht woke sind”. Na ganz toll. Da hilft woke Nazipropaganda sicher dagegen. /s

Mach es dir selbst.

Das ist jetzt wirklich “google doch einfach selbst!” Schwurblerniveau.

Wenn es so einfach ist, dann kannst du ja sicher ein Argument draus machen, damit eine Diskussion entstehen kann. Oder willst du dich einfach nicht angreifbar machen für woke Nationalistenpropaganda?

Na, dann erleuchte mich mal. Und jetzt ist man schon troll, weil man nationalistischen slop in woke kritisiert, oder was? Mach mal ein Argument draus!

Jo, offenbar weißt du auch kein Problem, was “nationalistischer Slop in woke” jetzt genau lösen soll.

Um welches Problem geht es denn genau?

Und du glaubst tatsächlich, dass solch ein selbstfallustierendes geshitposte auch nur einen patriotisch eingestellten Menschen überzeugen wird? Ich bitte dich!

Das ist nichts weiteres, als selbstgefälliges geshitposte von nationalistischen Linksliberalos. Solche Menschen haben am Ende mit der gemäßigten AfD Führungsriege mehr gemein, als linke mit einem kohärenten politischen Weltbild.

Carl Sagan said that you need a universe first.