• scintilla@crust.piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Do you usually only read one source and decide that’s enough information or is it just because climate science keeps having worse and worse news that you do this?

    • troed@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      If you don’t know what the IPCC does I think you should study that first and then reply.

      • scintilla@crust.piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I now know enough to know that AR6 was concluded 2 years ago and since then there has been increasing evidence that our most dire models are actually rather optimistic. Even if we went carbon zero today temperature would still continue to uptick for years do to runaway affects that we were unaware of.

        • troed@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s not how climate science works. The IPCC reports detail the current scientific consensus. Single papers do not change the consensus as soon as they are published.

          IPCC AR6 on the contrary said things are better than we thought in AR5, and downgraded the likelyhood for the worst scenarios to play out.

          Have you read any IPCC reports?

            • RangerAndTheCat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              You tried friend. Best to just leave this one be. Some people just want to live in their own world and refute reality even when presented overwhelmingly loads of evidence to the contrary.

              You tried save your sanity trust me I’ve gone that road with others before it is not worth your time or energy till they are willing and able to hear you.

              Hope you have a great day :)

            • troed@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              4 days ago

              You really don’t understand how the scientific method works.

              That makes you a climate science denier.