Lol, I don’t cause you to argue in bad faith (with entire comments full of fallacies), that’s you who does so of your own “brainpower.”
You’ve not once made a valid counterargument or even provided evidence. What evidence? The only content I’ve seen is your ableism and ad hominems. Can you actually form an independent, good faith argument backed with valid evidence? I haven’t seen evidence of THAT being able to happen yet.
Again, you seem to think Lemmy mods are in charge of who is and isnt a Nazi, that’s so strange lol. But I dont usually report to mods, I’m an adult who can handle an argument (are you?). I also am an adult who can read what people write and form opinions about them, without needing another adult to intervene or tell me how to think. Maybe that’s your issue? No mod or big friend to tell you how to argue in good faith here?
I don’t need to provide any evidence? You’re the one making claims, the burden of proof is on you. Nobody has to do any work to disprove claims YOU’RE making.
EDIT: somebody just pointed out your profile to me, the whole bluesky thing, and the fact you joined on april 1st, and I can’t believe I fell for it for so long. I’ll admit it, this was peak level trolling, I got jebaited lmao. kudos, you are an epic prankster.
Yes, you do need to provide evidence for your claims. I’ve provided evidence and explained my position, and your position has been fallacies and ad homs. That’s not a valid refutation. That you need this explained to you is … Lol
your fallacy is the fallacy fallacy
That’s not how fallacies work lol. You have to specifically outline what part of speech is using fallacious arguments. It’s not “my” fallacy lol
That’s also not how the fallacy fallacy works in argument, because it 1) shows you admit you have argued in bad faith and 2) goes back to arguing in good faith because that is what is considered reasonable, that is, able to be reasoned with, and not nonsense 3) you based your argument on the fallacies themselves, thus making it fallacious
That the argument is fallacious only means that the argument cannot succeed in proving its consequent.[6] But showing how one argument in a complex thesis is fallaciously reasoned does not necessarily invalidate its conclusion if that conclusion is not dependent on the fallacy.
Your conclusions are dependent on the fallacy, you admit it is a fallacy, and you cannot argue in good faith at all. That’s known as - you lose. You have no substantial argument.
Yes, you do need to provide evidence for your claims.
No, I don’t, because I didn’t make any claims. I don’t need to disprove your conspiracy any more than I need to disprove that some god or another doesn’t exist. Don’t be so fucking lazy, if you want people to think you’re anything more than some idiot on the internet, prove your own theories.
You came back a week later to once again spout barely legible nonsense, probably thinking yourself particularly clever. A notion that is disabused by your seeming inability to understand even the arguments you’re making, let alone those of others.
This is Lemmy. Nobody has to engage with you in good faith, nobody has to humor your demands. Nobody has to listen attentively while you spout conspiracy theories. And if you seriously think I “lose” anything by not agreeing with you simply because you desire me to, then it does nothing other than show how lonely and unfulfilling your life is. Until you responded, I had forgotten you even existed. A week from now, I will have forgotten again. You’re simply not relevant in any way to me.
Now do us both a favor, and go away. Feeling pity for you is making me sad.
Removed by mod
Lol, I don’t cause you to argue in bad faith (with entire comments full of fallacies), that’s you who does so of your own “brainpower.”
You’ve not once made a valid counterargument or even provided evidence. What evidence? The only content I’ve seen is your ableism and ad hominems. Can you actually form an independent, good faith argument backed with valid evidence? I haven’t seen evidence of THAT being able to happen yet.
Again, you seem to think Lemmy mods are in charge of who is and isnt a Nazi, that’s so strange lol. But I dont usually report to mods, I’m an adult who can handle an argument (are you?). I also am an adult who can read what people write and form opinions about them, without needing another adult to intervene or tell me how to think. Maybe that’s your issue? No mod or big friend to tell you how to argue in good faith here?
I don’t need to provide any evidence? You’re the one making claims, the burden of proof is on you. Nobody has to do any work to disprove claims YOU’RE making.
also, your fallacy is the fallacy fallacy. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy
EDIT: somebody just pointed out your profile to me, the whole bluesky thing, and the fact you joined on april 1st, and I can’t believe I fell for it for so long. I’ll admit it, this was peak level trolling, I got jebaited lmao. kudos, you are an epic prankster.
Yes, you do need to provide evidence for your claims. I’ve provided evidence and explained my position, and your position has been fallacies and ad homs. That’s not a valid refutation. That you need this explained to you is … Lol
That’s not how fallacies work lol. You have to specifically outline what part of speech is using fallacious arguments. It’s not “my” fallacy lol
That’s also not how the fallacy fallacy works in argument, because it 1) shows you admit you have argued in bad faith and 2) goes back to arguing in good faith because that is what is considered reasonable, that is, able to be reasoned with, and not nonsense 3) you based your argument on the fallacies themselves, thus making it fallacious
Your conclusions are dependent on the fallacy, you admit it is a fallacy, and you cannot argue in good faith at all. That’s known as - you lose. You have no substantial argument.
Again, that you need this explained to you is lol
May you end up in court some day, please 🙏
No, I don’t, because I didn’t make any claims. I don’t need to disprove your conspiracy any more than I need to disprove that some god or another doesn’t exist. Don’t be so fucking lazy, if you want people to think you’re anything more than some idiot on the internet, prove your own theories.
You came back a week later to once again spout barely legible nonsense, probably thinking yourself particularly clever. A notion that is disabused by your seeming inability to understand even the arguments you’re making, let alone those of others.
This is Lemmy. Nobody has to engage with you in good faith, nobody has to humor your demands. Nobody has to listen attentively while you spout conspiracy theories. And if you seriously think I “lose” anything by not agreeing with you simply because you desire me to, then it does nothing other than show how lonely and unfulfilling your life is. Until you responded, I had forgotten you even existed. A week from now, I will have forgotten again. You’re simply not relevant in any way to me.
Now do us both a favor, and go away. Feeling pity for you is making me sad.