The Force Awakens and its follow-ups had so few memorable characters, it’s a wonder Disney – and Oscar Isaac – are still talking about potential spin-offs
The Force Awakens and its follow-ups had so few memorable characters, it’s a wonder Disney – and Oscar Isaac – are still talking about potential spin-offs
deleted by creator
Well yes, but wasn’t the 7th film a reboot of the 1st? It doesn’t matter whether it was a good idea initially or not, the point is that changing your mind halfway through about who the big villain is doesn’t leave you with enough time to establish a proper replacement.
This is a third act story beat that happened during the second act. The reason why the Vader storyline works is because it has nearly three films worth of development before its big climax.
deleted by creator
I guess you watched some alternative universe version of the first two films, because Smoke was 100% the big bad until he was killed off. You literally just acknowledged him as an Emperor re-tread lol
deleted by creator
“Evoking notes” of the previous character…who was the big bad.
deleted by creator
But you said J.J. Abrams was being “unoriginal” with The Force Awakens. In other words, copying the original film/trilogy. In the original trilogy, the Emperor is clearly the big bad and this is established in the first film. So if Smoke is the equivalent of Palpatine, as was also established in the first film of the sequel trilogy, he is clearly the big bad up until Rian Johnson kills him off prematurely. Your core argument here doesn’t line up.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator