• Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d buy a 8k TV, provided that it has no smarts, no WiFi, no TV tuner and its price isn’t over 5% than a 4k TV

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Somehow when it’s called a “monitor” it quadruples the price.

        I can’t really accept that a basic 4k 27" monitor without even speakers costs the same of a 4k 65" TV with HDR, deeper blacks, WiFi and it even comes bundled with dozens of spyware for added convenience

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The cost difference is right there in your description, pixel density is prohibitively expensive