Depends on your goals:
setup surveillance stations around the world to record history?
Take back a encyclopedia to ancient Egypt?
Setup your own idyllic getaway island?
The right knowledge at the right time could have huge impact on a developing society
And when you do eat, how do you stop? Because my brain knows there’s more food in the kitchen. It also knows how to make more food. And it’s going to go in there. It’s exhausting to have to say no every second of every day to a brain that’s a toddler.
Going keto can remove the food noise, which could make it easier to make sustainable changes to your nutrition.
Cico is vacuously true.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vacuously
Showing a lack of thought or intelligence; vacant.
Surprisingly, I agree with you! CICO is lacking in thought and intelligence when applied to human metabolism.
The second law of thermodynamics requires a closed system, humans are famously open what with their breathing, eating, pooping, and peeing.
CICO is like saying cars without fuel don’t move, so if overfill the tank you should park your car. It misses the point, and that is the hormonal drivers in human fat mobilization.
Sugar/Carbs drive blood glucose, which drives blood insulin, which shuts down fat mobilization. Yes, you can lose weight eating only sugar, but it’s making the entire process more difficult then it needs to be. For more details please see The Carbohydrate-Insulin Model of Obesity - Beyond “Calories In, Calories Out” - 2018
++ Keto works because its keeps insulin levels from going high, when insulin is high the body simply cannot metabolize stored fat (at all).
Doing low calorie works by itself, but its hard mode, eating a bunch of insulin spiking meals throughout the day makes it much harder to burn through that sugar, lower the insulin, and eventually metabolize stored fat.
It’s a bench top conventional oven.
With a fan!
Nothing is stopping other countries from funding international programs
The funny thing, the truly funny thing, Is that many people reading this will assume their assumptions about nutrition are fact based and everybody else’s is pseudoscience. Examining the data on your own biases is critical for any standing in science.
The signal protocol is solid, so people argue there isn’t a known fault with the protocol which is true.
SVR prevents signal from having access to the keys directly, you still need to compromise SGX (which happened two years ago) or access to intel signing keys.
So the signal foundation doesn’t have a trivial way to access keys, but the TLAs do.
It’s automated testing to see if they can force you to login.
My VPN (mullvad) lets me use socks5 proxies for any exit node, so when I hit this I just change my freetube proxy number and it works. Annoying
It would be nice to integrate a list of socks5 proxies into freetube and have it auto rotate
Fwiw: signal is a honey pot, perhaps not by intent but by architecture.
Security postures are driven by capabilities not intentions.
Signal:
Thus a three letter agency has the capability of breaking signal, even if they don’t intend to.
As a thought experiment imagine you run the intelligence service of a non-us ally country (nk, Iran, China, Russia, etc) - would you in good faith recommend using signal, as is, for your classified and sensitive government communications?
SVR stores master key backed by a trivial pin, but uses Intel sgx enclaves to prevent brute forcing… a TLA just gets Intel to sign new code for the sgx enclave that allows brute forcing, runs it against the cloud data extracts master keys, and ta da all communication revealed.
Signal allows people to store their master key using a random bip32 key, but even if you do this, none of your contacts will do this
Having worked with such setups before, yes the top row is used, infrequently but watched
It’s easier to make fun of people then to engage with them, because engagement requires honest intellectual rigor
Do you have a newsletter?
What if Neom was a canal instead dystopian cyberpunk dream
I guess some people don’t make chocolate covered birds eye chili’s for snacks?
Only people with compromised circulation? Last I checked only 96% of westerners have compromised metabolic health.
So this article is saying for 4% of the population aphrodisiacs are ineffective. Ha
Don’t review the game until after people buy it!
The term of art is “price discovery”
They did this to me as well, they didn’t clarify in DM either… So I removed all my previous content from the community and blocked it.