And I thought they were supposed to be shying away from fossil fuels.

  • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
    4·
    22 hours ago

    One holds human beings in distress, and the other a garbage vehicle. Your comment is disgusting and shows how you value life.

    • sfu@lemm.eeEnglish
      11·
      12 hours ago

      You know what, the first time, I totally read your comment completely different than how you meant it. So my previous reply would have been different.

      Even so, my comment was not disgusting, it was just using logic.

      • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
        1·
        9 hours ago

        Do you know what? No, you obviously don’t, and it’s sad.

        I wish that you would see the fallacy of your argument, but a cult of personality has you captured.

        Empathy and reading a room are not some of your strengths.

        Good day.

        • sfu@lemm.eeEnglish
          1·
          3 hours ago

          Or maybe a cult of personality has you captured, preventing you from being able to see it from both sides point of view as I am doing.

          You don’t have to agree with the other side in order to see it from their perspective.

    • silverlose@lemm.eeEnglish
      3·
      20 hours ago

      I agree. It’s a false equivalency.

      It’s super similar to the idea behind the original tea party. They didn’t do insane shit like burn down buildings with people inside, they tossed tea into the water. If we could do something similar, I’m sure we would.