• 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s a fantastic move but it also goes under “worst guy you know makes a great point”.

  • aleats@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 day ago

    Government-sponsored facial recognition aside, I was gonna celebrate this as a rare event of a government doing something right, but then

    The measures don’t apply to researchers or to what machine translation of the rules describes as “algorithm training activities” – suggesting images of citizens’ faces are fair game when used to train AI models.

    and I feel like that undermines the entire idea, since you can easily hide behind that excuse and not give a shit. And given previous circumstances, I feel like a lot of companies are gonna get away with it.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sure that ban doesn’t apply to government operated facial recognition cameras though.

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I think it’d be naive to assume your own government isn’t doing the same thing

  • tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Facial recognition is dystopian, sure. But its also a security risk against foreign adversaries. No, sir, it is not `on brand´ for China.