This is always a wild one to me, he did it and hes a hero for it, stop erasing his badass act. It’s such a fringe conspiracy that not even Luigi has endorsed it
Allegedly…he hasn’t admitted to anything afaik… and as far as I’ve seen the evidence is flimsy …why would he escape and then hang out in a fast food restaurant with the disposable murder weapon?
To answer your question in a non facetious way, there’s a phenomenon called the csi effect. Essentially, juries expect csi levels of ironclad proof that tends to make it much harder than expected to convict.
Combined with the high profile and over politicisation and publication of the case, i see it damn near impossible fornthem to find 12 jurists who will unanimously find not only enough evidence, but not have a refuser based on sociopolitical contexts- much like how OJ walked on the LAPD’s corruption.
Why would he be acquited?
Edit: when a question gets downvoted you just might be too emotionally fragile to be online
I downvoted you just for your petulant little edit.
Same
Well I upvoted them just to balance the score out and give paying spectators value for money
He’s innocent
This is always a wild one to me, he did it and hes a hero for it, stop erasing his badass act. It’s such a fringe conspiracy that not even Luigi has endorsed it
Allegedly…he hasn’t admitted to anything afaik… and as far as I’ve seen the evidence is flimsy …why would he escape and then hang out in a fast food restaurant with the disposable murder weapon?
deleted by creator
This community is super fascist about dissent
deleted by creator
Yes sir I will toe the line sir
If a jury of his peers do not choose to convict.
Only downvoted for your edit.
Projection, my friend.
I up voted because who the fuck would assume any practical result where USA is concerned.
It’s naive to think that Luigi has any future in a fascist country.
To answer your question in a non facetious way, there’s a phenomenon called the csi effect. Essentially, juries expect csi levels of ironclad proof that tends to make it much harder than expected to convict.
Combined with the high profile and over politicisation and publication of the case, i see it damn near impossible fornthem to find 12 jurists who will unanimously find not only enough evidence, but not have a refuser based on sociopolitical contexts- much like how OJ walked on the LAPD’s corruption.