• emzili@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s simple actually, curl has a bug bounty program where reporting even a minor legitimate vulnerability can land you at a minimum $540

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If they ever actually identify one, make a very public post stating that as this was identified using AI there will be no bounty paid.

    • zygo_histo_morpheus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      What are the odds that you’re actually going to get a bounty out of it? Seems unlikely that an AI would hallucinate an actually correct bug.

      Maybe the people doing this are much more optimistic about how useful LLMs are for this than I am but it’s possible that there’s some more malicious idea behind it.

      • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The user who submitted the report that Stenberg considered the “last straw” seems to have a history of getting bounty payouts; I have no idea how many of those were AI-assisted, but it’s possible that by using an LLM to automate making reports, they’re making some money despite having a low success rate.

      • CandleTiger@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Maybe the people doing this are much more optimistic about how useful LLMs are for this than I am

        Yes. That is the problem being reported in this article. There are many many people who have complete and unblemished optimism about how useful LLMs are, to the point where they don’t understand it’s optimism and don’t understand why other people won’t take them seriously.

        Some of them are professionals in related fields