• N0x0n@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It does “support” LVM, but with a wacky/hacky workaround and that’s a real shame !

    Also, there is some talking on github on how they will probably completely drop LVM in the near futur… That’s not what someone should expect from a Linux installer!

    • Exec@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Also, there is some talking on github on how they will probably completely drop LVM in the near futur… That’s not what someone should expect from a Linux installer!

      It’s a shitshow. Looking at their repo’s issues list has lots of noise, but the worst of them is that the LVM issue has been open for over a year now. Sure, open source, anyone’s free to work on it by why would distros use such a feature incomplete installer?

        • Exec@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Not really an “Average Windows/MacOS user will run into” issue but most power users would run into it

        • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I don’t think that’s true. Administration tools could build on top of it, like snapshotting, which even if it does not work the best that way, it will work. and that can just run in the background, automatically, just like it does with snapper on btrfs now on some systems.