• blackbeards_bounty@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        13 days ago

        Underwear is not for padding. I suspected my insistence on wearing both wasn’t a “real” cyclists’ choice, but this comment is first confirmation I’ve seen of that.

        Your shorts must be nasty.

        • horse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          13 days ago

          The reason for not wearing underwear is that it can cause chafing or pressure points where it shifts or creases. Cycling shorts are designed to minimise that by not doing either. There is nothing nasty about cycling shorts if you wash them after each ride. If anything they handle sweat better than cotton underwear would.

          That being said, if you feel better wearing underwear, then you should feel free to do so. But there are practical reasons why most people don’t and they don’t have anything to do with trying to be a “real cyclist”.

        • SirActionSack@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Most people wash their stuff when it gets sweaty but if just changing underwear is working for you and the people who are exposed to you then keep on keeping on I suppose.

    • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      I don’t get it either. I have a good saddle and just wear boxers and cotton shorts. No problems all day long, when I get the chance for weeks at a time.

    • tuff_wizard@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      I usually wear brief style under where and the legs always roll up your leg when you pull up the riding shorts. If you just wore tighty whities it might not happen