• fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s autism, not a death sentence.

    To me, it seems like online discussions for any stance, has to turn to it’s most extreme. It’s like their way or highway type of deal. Whatever happened to nuanced discussion, I wonder.

    • tweeks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think it stems from the more difficult cases, and people failing to realize the actual suffering that comes with that.

      As with all extremes, a lot of emotions are involved. People who see / experience the hardships don’t feel heard. As the general tendency is that one needs to be alive and that this is good, this hurts people who do not want to live (like this).

      Going to a lot of trouble to conceive, and bringing triple the amount of possible suffering that people experience can be felt as worse than a death sentence. Therefore people feel the need to be vocal about this.

      But in the end I agree, there is nuance. But there is the extreme as well, which weighs heavier here?

    • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      We would certainly be better off without it. Doesn’t it have a much higher likelihood of happening when women bear children around 40? If we know a partial cause then maybe we should avoid it. I saw a billboard about a 58-year-old woman having a baby and I was horrified.